South Carolina Candidates Debate Education Scholarship Fund
State superintendent candidates hold starkly different positions on the future of the Education Scholarship Trust Fund.
Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Scholarships

Live Poll
Should public funds be used to subsidize private school tuition for students in your area?
South Carolina superintendent candidates remain divided over the future of the state's $83 million Education Scholarship Trust Fund. The program, which subsidizes educational expenses for students not in zoned public schools, currently faces growing scrutiny from lawmakers.
Why it matters
The program has become a central point of contention as South Carolina balances educational choice with public school funding. Legislators have raised concerns regarding student performance data and eligibility, leading to calls for increased oversight.
South Carolina has allocated $83 million toward the scholarship program this year. State law currently limits participation to 15,000 students, though candidates have proposed expansion thresholds as high as 20,000.
The players
Ellen Weaver
She is a candidate for state superintendent who supports expanding the current scholarship program.
Sylvia Wright
She is a candidate for state superintendent who opposes using public funds for private school tuition.
The details
While the Department of Education has expanded eligibility to include home-educated students, critics and some senators are demanding a formal audit. The audit, requested by a bipartisan group of senators, stems from concerns over data collection and eligibility transparency.
Timeline
The Education Scholarship Trust Fund was signed into law in 2023.
A bipartisan group of state senators requested an audit of the program in March 2026.
South Carolina is spending $83 million on the voucher program throughout 2026.
Culture Shift
This debate reflects a broader societal shift regarding the role of state-funded school choice programs versus traditional public education. It follows a pattern set by the Education Scholarship Trust Fund by examining the political friction between state-funded private options and public school mandates.
Families participating in the program or those seeking non-public educational options will see their financial aid stability tied to the outcome of the superintendent race and the pending audit. Shifts in the program's cap may determine whether current applicants remain eligible for future funding rounds.
The takeaway
The future of South Carolina's voucher program depends on balancing enrollment capacity with legislative requirements for performance transparency. Voters should evaluate how each candidate plans to address the audit findings and manage the program's budget constraints.
Further reading
For additional context on local educational funding initiatives, visit the South Carolina Scholarships section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by The Herald.
Live Poll
Should public funds be used to subsidize private school tuition for students in your area?










