Perry, Stelson Debate in Harrisburg Congressional Race
The candidates for Pennsylvania's 10th District squared off over housing policy and military engagement.
Updated on Oct. 15, 2026 in Legislative Policy
Live Poll
Should congressional candidates prioritize debating legislative impacts over attacking their opponent's past voting record?
Scott Perry and Janelle Stelson met for a televised debate at WHTM-ABC27 in Harrisburg to discuss their platforms. The event highlighted sharp disagreements over housing legislation and the candidates' past records regarding Iran.
Why it matters
The debate underscores the distinct policy visions the candidates offer voters competing for Pennsylvania's 10th Congressional District seat. These differences on economic and foreign policy are central to the ongoing campaign.
The debate centered on the 10th Congressional District seat, with Janelle Stelson accusing Scott Perry of voting for war with Iran six times. The candidates also clashed over specific housing measures, including the 21st Century Road to Housing Act.
The players
Scott Perry
He is a candidate for the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania who currently represents the seat.
Janelle Stelson
She is a candidate for the 10th Congressional District of Pennsylvania running against incumbent Scott Perry.
The details
The candidates exchanged accusations regarding past voting records and potential policy paths during the session. Scott Perry specifically opposed the Senate version of the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, while Janelle Stelson called for the removal of tariffs on home building materials.
Timeline
The televised debate took place on October 14, 2026.
Political Context
Opponents of the proposed 21st Century Road to Housing Act argue the legislation may fail to address the root causes of the current housing inventory crisis. Conversely, supporters contend the policy provides necessary tools to expand development and reduce building costs for families.
Voters in the 10th District will see direct consequences from the candidates' opposing views on housing legislation and tariffs on construction materials. These policy decisions could fundamentally shift the local cost of new home construction and housing availability.
The takeaway
Voters should review the specific voting records mentioned during the event to understand how each candidate plans to address national housing shortages. Evaluating these stated positions helps clarify the potential legislative impact of either candidate on the district's future.
Further reading
For more background on the issues, visit the Legislative Policy section.
Live Poll
Should congressional candidates prioritize debating legislative impacts over attacking their opponent's past voting record?
