Ninth Circuit Upheld OHSU Vaccine Mandate Firing
The court ruled that accommodating a religious exemption would have created an undue hardship for the hospital.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Nursing Jobs
Live Poll
Should employers be required to grant religious exemptions for mandatory workplace vaccine policies?
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled against a former nurse who challenged her termination from Oregon Health and Science University. A 2-1 decision affirmed the hospital's firing of the employee following her request for a religious vaccine exemption.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the legal standard for employers regarding religious accommodations under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It establishes that courts may prioritize the operational requirements of healthcare institutions over individual exemption requests when those requests create an undue hardship.
The appeals court issued a 2-1 decision affirming the termination of a nurse who sought a religious exemption from a mandate. The hospital cited undue hardship as the basis for denying the request before the 2021 firing.
The players
Oregon Health and Science University
This is a public research university and healthcare system located in Oregon.
Brittany K. MacDonald
She is the former nurse who brought a lawsuit against her employer following her termination in 2021.
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
This is a federal court that hears appeals from district courts in the western United States.
The details
The lawsuit alleged that the hospital violated the First Amendment and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by denying the request. The court held that the university acted within legal bounds because the requested accommodation imposed significant operational burdens on the facility.
Timeline
Brittany K. MacDonald was fired by the hospital in 2021.
The Ninth Circuit court issued its ruling on September 25, 2026.
Market Landscape
This case follows established judicial interpretations of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act regarding the limits of employer-provided religious accommodations in healthcare settings. It clarifies the legal threshold for hospital mandates and employer-mandated vaccination policies across the region.
Healthcare workers in the state should note that courts are currently upholding employer mandates when institutional hardships are documented. This decision sets a clear precedent for staff members regarding the enforceability of vaccine-related employment conditions.
The takeaway
This ruling highlights the difficulty of securing religious exemptions in healthcare settings when employers demonstrate an undue hardship. Professionals should consult current labor policy guidelines to understand how judicial interpretations impact their employment rights.
Further reading
For more information on employment standards in the medical field, visit Nursing Jobs.
Live Poll
Should employers be required to grant religious exemptions for mandatory workplace vaccine policies?
