Oklahoma Man Sentenced for Threatening Congressman
A federal court sentenced 35-year-old Chad Allen Haeberie to 52 months in prison for threatening a U.S. Representative.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Terrorism
Live Poll
Do you trust that public officials are sufficiently protected from violent threats in our country?
Chad Allen Haeberie of Jay, Oklahoma, has received a 52-month federal prison sentence for sending a series of threatening emails to U.S. Representative Josh Brecheen. Following his prison term, Haeberie must serve three years of supervised release.
Why it matters
The sentencing addresses criminal threats made against a federal official, which included explicit promises of assault, kidnapping, and murder. The defendant reportedly continued to express threatening rhetoric even after being taken into custody.
A federal court in Tulsa sentenced the 35-year-old defendant to 52 months of incarceration followed by three years of supervised release. The legal proceedings concluded following the defendant's conviction for sending messages that threatened the life of a public official.
The players
Chad Allen Haeberie
He is a 35-year-old resident of Jay, Oklahoma, who was convicted of sending threatening messages to a member of Congress.
Josh Brecheen
He is a U.S. Representative who received explicit threats of violence in emails sent by the defendant.
The details
Between December 2024 and July 2025, Haeberie sent multiple emails to Representative Josh Brecheen. These communications contained explicit threats to kidnap, assault, and murder the official.
Timeline
December 2024 to July 2025: Haeberie sent threatening emails to Brecheen.
October 2, 2026: The court sentenced Haeberie to prison.
Legal Context
The prosecution of these threats highlights the increased scrutiny regarding the security of federal lawmakers. Recent legal actions across the country reflect a consistent judicial approach to prosecuting communications that express intent to harm government officials.
The resolution of this case serves as a warning regarding the consequences of issuing violent threats against public figures in the region. Residents and local officials remain subject to established federal protections against targeted harassment and intimidation.
The takeaway
This case illustrates the severe federal repercussions for individuals who use digital communication to target public officials with violent threats. Authorities remain committed to monitoring and prosecuting such communications to ensure the safety of government representatives.
Further reading
For more information on national security and federal threat investigations, visit the Terrorism section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by KOKH.
Live Poll
Do you trust that public officials are sufficiently protected from violent threats in our country?
