Advocates Requested Violence Prevention Funding
Community groups testified before Oklahoma lawmakers seeking sustainable support for violence intervention programs.
Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in Violence

Live Poll
Should states prioritize funding community-led violence intervention programs?
Community organizations testified before Oklahoma lawmakers to request long-term state funding for local violence prevention initiatives. Advocates highlighted the need for stable support to expand programs that use mentorship and conflict de-escalation to reduce gun violence.
Why it matters
Proponents argue that dedicated state funding for violence prevention could effectively reduce crime rates and decrease public safety costs over time. These initiatives aim to interrupt cycles of violence by focusing on high-risk individuals through direct engagement and community partnerships.
Advocates provided testimony to state lawmakers regarding program needs, but legislative action on specific funding requests remains pending. The current initiative relies on organizations like Live Free Oklahoma and Peace City to conduct ongoing intervention efforts.
The players
Live Free Oklahoma
This organization works to address systemic violence and promote community safety through local intervention strategies.
Peace City
Operating primarily in Northeast Oklahoma City, this group utilizes mentorship to prevent youth involvement in violence.
Bangin' for Jesus Ministries
This faith-based organization provides outreach and support services to individuals facing high risks of gun violence.
Jabee Williams
An advocate who shared personal history regarding the death of his brother to highlight the urgency of violence intervention.
The details
Organizations such as Live Free Oklahoma, Peace City, and Bangin' for Jesus Ministries use credible messengers to build relationships and de-escalate tensions in high-risk areas of Oklahoma City, including the Northeast and South sides. These groups collaborate with local churches, schools, hospitals, and law enforcement to reach at-risk populations and intervene before violence or retaliatory acts occur.
Timeline
Advocates testified to Oklahoma lawmakers on September 22, 2026.
Legal Context
The push for dedicated funding reflects a broader national shift toward treating community violence as a public health issue rather than strictly a law enforcement matter. By aligning with the methodology of the Cure Violence global health model, these programs seek to professionalize the role of credible messengers in local safety strategies.
If state funding is secured, residents could see an expansion of intervention services in neighborhoods currently affected by gun violence. This could lead to increased availability of mentorship programs and professional support for at-risk youth in areas like Northeast and South Oklahoma City.
The takeaway
Effective violence prevention often relies on the work of credible messengers who can bridge gaps between community members and institutional resources. Supporting these local initiatives requires both consistent funding and sustained collaboration across schools, hospitals, and faith-based groups.
Further reading
Learn more about local efforts by visiting the Violence section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by News 9.
Live Poll
Should states prioritize funding community-led violence intervention programs?










