Judge Ruled Jani-King Misclassified Oklahoma Workers
A federal court determined that Jani-King of Oklahoma wrongly categorized franchise owners as independent contractors.
Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in Human Resources
Live Poll
Should companies be required to classify franchise owners as employees instead of independent contractors?
A federal judge has ruled that Jani-King of Oklahoma violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by misclassifying its franchise owners as independent contractors. The court ordered the company to begin maintaining proper employment records for these workers.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the ongoing legal challenges regarding worker classification and the obligation of companies to provide employee protections under federal law. It reflects a critical shift in how janitorial services must manage their labor force to remain compliant.
A 2019 settlement involving Jani-King International, Inc. totaled $3.7 million. The current ruling mandates that the company now maintain employment records in accordance with federal law.
The players
Charles B. Goodwin
He is a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma who issued the ruling.
Jani-King of Oklahoma
This is a regional janitorial service provider that was found to have misclassified its workers.
Jani-King International, Inc.
This is the global parent organization that previously reached a multi-million dollar settlement regarding worker classification in 2019.
The details
Judge Charles B. Goodwin issued the decision for the US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, determining that the company failed to classify workers correctly. The ruling requires Jani-King of Oklahoma to align its internal record-keeping practices with the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Timeline
In 2019, workers in Pennsylvania reached a $3.7 million settlement.
Judge Charles B. Goodwin issued the ruling on September 22, 2026.
Market Landscape
This ruling aligns with broader efforts to strictly enforce the Fair Labor Standards Act across the janitorial industry. By forcing a reclassification, the decision complicates the traditional franchise model that has allowed companies to shift labor costs away from standard employment.
Franchise owners operating under this model may now see changes in their employment status and legal protections. For the average customer, these labor shifts could eventually lead to changes in service pricing or company operational procedures.
The takeaway
Workers should review their employment contracts to understand their rights in light of recent court rulings. Companies operating in the state must carefully audit their worker classifications to avoid similar legal actions.
Further reading
For more on workplace compliance, visit our Human Resources section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.
Live Poll
Should companies be required to classify franchise owners as employees instead of independent contractors?
