Rep. Max Miller Declined Questions on High School Assault
The Ohio representative refused to address alleged assault claims during a deposition for a custody dispute.
Updated on Oct. 1, 2026 in Secondary Education
Live Poll
Do you trust public officials who decline to address past assault allegations under oath?
Rep. Max Miller refused to answer questions about a high school assault allegation during a sworn deposition on Monday. His attorney instructed him not to respond, citing legal objections during the ongoing custody battle with Emily Moreno.
Why it matters
The refusal to address these allegations in a formal legal setting keeps questions surrounding the congressman's past conduct unresolved. This deposition is a central part of a broader custody dispute currently moving through the legal system.
The alleged high school incident occurred 20 years ago at a time when 8 to 10 friends were reportedly present at Miller's home. Miller additionally confirmed during his testimony that he previously used testosterone replacement therapy.
The players
Max Miller
He is the U.S. Representative for Ohio's 7th congressional district.
Emily Moreno
She is the individual currently involved in a custody battle with Max Miller.
Michael Kruse
He is a journalist who previously reported on the allegations involving the representative.
The details
During the deposition, lawyers for Emily Moreno questioned Miller regarding an assault allegation stemming from his time at a Shaker Heights high school. Miller has previously denied behaving violently toward the woman involved in that incident or toward his ex-wife, though he also confirmed undergoing an investigation by Ohio authorities for child abuse that resulted in an unsubstantiated finding.
Timeline
The alleged high school incident occurred 20 years ago.
Michael Kruse reported on the alleged high school incident in 2021.
The deposition was conducted on Monday, September 28, 2026.
Culture Shift
The legal scrutiny reflects broader societal shifts toward re-examining the past conduct of public figures through the lens of modern accountability standards. This specific inquiry follows a trajectory of public questioning that began with the 2021 investigation into Rep. Max Miller's high school conduct.
The public proceedings highlight ongoing legal and social questions that have affected local discourse surrounding the representative. Residents following the case may see continued coverage as the custody battle proceeds through the state court system.
The takeaway
The refusal to answer questions during a sworn deposition often marks a strategic legal choice by counsel to limit further exposure. This event serves as a reminder of how private legal disputes can bring decades-old allegations back into the public eye.
Further reading
For more context on how local figures interact with the regional school system, visit Secondary Education.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Mother Jones.
Live Poll
Do you trust public officials who decline to address past assault allegations under oath?
