Court Reverses Block on Motorcyclist's Hit-and-Run Claim
A New York appellate court ordered hearings on whether a motorcyclist's uninsured motorist claim against Progressive Direct Insurance Company can proceed.
Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Insurance

The New York Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously reversed a Supreme Court, Bronx County order that permanently blocked a motorcyclist's uninsured motorist arbitration claim against Progressive Direct Insurance Company. The court sent the case back for hearings on physical contact and notice compliance.
Why it matters
The ruling means conflicting evidence about a hit-and-run must be tested at a hearing rather than dismissed outright. Physical contact with another vehicle is a threshold requirement for hit-and-run claims under New York law, making the outcome significant for riders seeking uninsured motorist coverage.
The appellate decision reversed a December 2025 Supreme Court, Bronx County order and cited a 24-hour policy reporting requirement for the claim. Whether the rider can prove physical contact and satisfy notice compliance is still unresolved and will be decided at the remanded hearings.
The players
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Progressive Direct Insurance Company is an auto insurer that sought a permanent block of the arbitration claim.
Appellate Division, First Department
The Appellate Division, First Department is New York's intermediate appellate court that reversed the lower court's ruling.
The details
An EMS report from a Bronx motorcycle accident noted the rider almost collided with a car and fell off his bike, while the dispatch reason was listed as 'Pedestrian Struck.' The motorcyclist said an unknown vehicle struck his motorcycle and that he gave information to police, though he was unsure why no NYPD report was filed.
Timeline
• December 2025: Supreme Court, Bronx County granted Progressive's permanent block.
• October 29, 2026: The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously reversed the order.
Market Dynamics
New York's physical contact requirement for hit-and-run uninsured motorist claims, a threshold long used by insurers to deny riders' claims, is applied here but subjected to a hearing rather than a permanent block. The decision signals that disputed accident facts will be weighed in court before coverage is foreclosed.
Riders and drivers relying on uninsured motorist coverage in New York may face similar disputes over whether physical contact occurred in hit-and-run crashes. Insurers can still contest such claims, so documenting the accident and promptly reporting it to police and the insurer may affect the outcome.
The takeaway
Hit-and-run uninsured motorist claims can turn on whether physical contact is proven, so prompt reporting and clear documentation of the accident matter. Courts may allow disputed facts to be tested at a hearing before a claim is permanently barred.
Further reading
Learn more about how auto coverage works in our Insurance section.










