Judge Orders Floyd Mayweather to Pay Unpaid Rent

A New York court issued a default judgment requiring the boxer to pay nearly $340,000 in arrears and fees.

Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Apartments

Judge Orders Floyd Mayweather to Pay Unpaid Rent

Live Poll

Do you believe the legal system is fair in holding high-profile individuals to their rental contracts?

A New York state court judge has issued a default judgment against Floyd Mayweather for failing to pay rent on a luxury condo at the Baccarat Hotel and Residences. Mayweather, who stopped paying his $100,000 monthly rent in mid-2025, failed to respond to the legal complaint filed against him.

Why it matters

The judgment underscores the legal consequences of breaching high-end residential lease agreements in New York City. Despite reaching an initial settlement to repay his debts by December 2025, Mayweather reportedly made only one payment before defaulting.

The court ordered Mayweather to pay nearly $340,000 covering unpaid rent, interest, and legal fees. The property at 20 West 53rd Street was recently sold by the owners for $20 million.

The players

Floyd Mayweather

He is a retired professional boxer and former world champion who is now the subject of a default judgment for unpaid rent.

The details

The property owners, who held the unit at the Baccarat Hotel and Residences, initiated the lawsuit via an LLC after the tenant ceased payments. Although a settlement was previously arranged, the lack of compliance led to the recent court-mandated judgment.

Floyd Mayweather began renting the luxury condo in December 2024.
Rent payments were halted by the tenant in mid-2025.
The deadline to repay debts under a prior settlement agreement was December 2, 2025.
The condo owners finalized the sale of the unit last week in October 2026.

Culture Shift

This case highlights the enforcement of standard lease contracts in New York City's high-end real estate market. It marks a departure from private settlements by moving into the public court system when contractual obligations are ignored.

For residents renting in competitive markets, this case highlights the necessity of strictly adhering to lease terms to avoid legal action. It also illustrates how property owners utilize the court system to recover losses when tenants fail to meet agreed-upon payment schedules.

The takeaway

Entering into high-end rental agreements carries the same legal weight and potential for litigation as any other contractual obligation. Tenants should ensure they have clear communication and legal advice if they encounter difficulty meeting their monthly financial commitments.