Former Employee Sues Rare Beauty Over Alleged Retaliation

A lawsuit filed in New York alleges that Rare Beauty and AllWork Inc. retaliated against an employee after she took leave.

Updated on Oct. 22, 2026 in Beauty

Bold flat-color editorial illustration depicting a single, towering stone building facade, evoking the institutional gravitas of legal proceedings.
Katia Etienne filed a federal lawsuit against Rare Beauty LLC and AllWork Inc. alleging workplace retaliation after taking protected medical leave. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

A former employee has filed a disability bias and retaliation lawsuit in federal court against Rare Beauty LLC and AllWork Inc. The plaintiff claims these companies created intolerable working conditions following her protected leave.

Why it matters

The lawsuit highlights the legal protections surrounding employee leave and the potential consequences for employers accused of retaliatory workplace practices. It brings attention to the standards of conduct required in professional environments when staff members exercise their right to care for family members.

Katia Etienne filed her complaint in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case involves allegations against Rare Beauty LLC and AllWork Inc. regarding workplace treatment.

The players

Katia Etienne

She is the former employee who filed a lawsuit alleging disability bias and retaliation.

Rare Beauty LLC

It is a cosmetics company founded by Selena Gomez that is named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

AllWork Inc.

It is a company named as a co-defendant in the legal action brought by the former employee.

The details

Katia Etienne alleges that she was excluded from required trainings and group communications while her work hours were reduced. She claims these actions were direct retaliation for taking protected leave to care for her mother, ultimately leading to her constructive discharge.

Timeline

  1. The plaintiff alleges the constructive discharge occurred in 2025.

  2. The legal complaint was filed in US District Court on October 21, 2026.

Culture Shift

This case reflects broader legal scrutiny regarding the Family and Medical Leave Act and the enforcement of protections for employees taking caregiving leave. It highlights an ongoing cultural and legal shift toward greater accountability for workplace treatment of employees who balance personal family responsibilities.

This lawsuit highlights the potential legal pitfalls for employers in New York City regarding staff management and leave policies. For the general public, it serves as a reminder of the rights employees maintain when balancing caregiving responsibilities with professional duties.

The takeaway

Employees should remain aware of their rights when taking protected leave to ensure they are shielded from retaliatory actions. Organizations are encouraged to maintain clear communication and standardized training protocols to avoid potential allegations of discriminatory work practices.

Further reading

For more information on legal and professional developments, read the latest news on Beauty.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.