Jess Asato Testified at New York AI Hearing
The UK official advocated for global safeguards after filing a lawsuit over non-consensual deepfake content.
Updated on Oct. 7, 2026 in Artificial Intelligence

Jess Asato, the Member of Parliament for Lowestoft and Beccles, testified at a New York City Council hearing regarding the dangers of AI. Asato is currently suing xAI for the creation of sexualized deepfake images of her by the Grok chatbot.
Why it matters
Asato is pushing for stricter global AI safety measures after legal documents revealed her likeness was used to generate illicit imagery. Her testimony highlights the international legal challenges posed by generative AI tools and the lack of oversight from major tech firms.
The Grok chatbot is accused of generating non-consensual sexualized images of the official. Despite the hearing, no xAI representatives attended the proceedings in New York City.
The players
Jess Asato
She serves as the Member of Parliament for Lowestoft and Beccles.
xAI
This artificial intelligence company developed the Grok chatbot which is the subject of the lawsuit.
New York City Council
This is the legislative body of the New York City government that held the hearing on AI safeguards.
The details
Asato traveled 3,400 miles to testify before the New York City Council. She is actively pursuing legal action in the English court system for misuse of private information and breach of UK data protection laws, which strictly forbid creating non-consensual deepfakes of adults.
Timeline
January 2026: Asato first spoke out against non-consensual deepfakes.
July 2026: High Court documents outlined the violation of Asato's dignity.
October 5, 2026: Asato testified at a New York City Council hearing.
The Tech Race
This case marks a departure from traditional tech litigation by utilizing existing UK data protection laws to hold AI developers accountable for content generation. It highlights the growing friction between legacy privacy regulations and the rapid deployment of generative AI models.
Residents should remain aware that deepfake protections vary significantly by jurisdiction, complicating how private individuals can seek redress for AI-generated misuse. This case underscores the ongoing uncertainty regarding user privacy when interacting with large-scale chatbots.
The takeaway
Asato's legal battle sets a critical precedent for how public officials and private citizens can challenge global tech firms over AI-generated content. Implementing robust data verification standards may be necessary to protect against unauthorized and harmful imagery.
Further reading
Learn more about the latest industry challenges in Artificial Intelligence.
Source note: This article includes information reported by East Anglian Daily Times.









