Judge Admitted Televised Confession in Murder Case

A judge ruled that statements made by a suspect during a television interview are admissible in his upcoming murder trial.

Updated on Oct. 3, 2026 in Crime — General

Judge Admitted Televised Confession in Murder Case

Live Poll

Should confessions made during media interviews be admissible as evidence in murder trials?

Judge William T. Little has ruled that a televised confession given by murder suspect Lorenz Kraus is admissible as evidence. Kraus faces charges for the 2017 deaths of his parents, Franz and Theresia Kraus.

Why it matters

The court determined that the televised interview did not violate the rights of the defendant because police did not instigate the interaction. However, investigators cannot use other statements made by Kraus after he invoked his right to remain silent.

Lorenz Kraus faces one count of first-degree murder and two counts of second-degree murder. The case against him follows the discovery of bodies at a Crestwood Court home, and the trial is scheduled to begin on January 11.

The players

William T. Little

He is the judge presiding over the murder trial of Lorenz Kraus in Albany.

Lorenz Kraus

He is the defendant charged with first-degree and second-degree murder in the deaths of his parents.

Greg Floyd

He is the news anchor who conducted the televised interview with the defendant.

Franz and Theresia Kraus

They were the parents of the defendant whose bodies were found in the backyard of their home.

The details

Judge William T. Little reached his decision after reviewing evidence from two days of hearings held in April and May. The court found that State Police involvement in the television interview with anchor Greg Floyd was limited only to security.

The deaths of Franz and Theresia Kraus occurred in 2017.
Concerns regarding the couple were raised in 2020.
A search warrant was executed at the Crestwood Court home on September 23, 2025.
Hearings regarding evidence admissibility took place in April and May 2026.
The murder trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2027.

Legal Context

This case reflects the ongoing judicial scrutiny of custodial interrogation protocols and the admissibility of out-of-court statements. The court's decision highlights the complex legal boundary between voluntary public confessions and statements protected by constitutional rights.

The resolution of these evidentiary hearings allows the legal process to move toward trial in January. Residents of Albany can expect public access to the upcoming trial proceedings as the judicial process continues.

The takeaway

This case demonstrates how legal protections against self-incrimination apply differently depending on the setting of the statement. Individuals involved in legal disputes should be aware that statements made outside of formal police interrogations may still be used in court proceedings.