New York Sought Dismissal of Lawsuit After Cardiac Arrest
The state filed for dismissal of a lawsuit claiming negligence after a student suffered a cardiac arrest during the bar exam.
Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Accidents
The New York Attorney General has requested the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Mary Jane Jung, who alleges she suffered a brain injury due to a delayed emergency response. State officials submitted surveillance footage to the New York Court of Claims to refute claims that employees failed to provide timely medical aid.
Why it matters
The state contends that recorded evidence proves its employees acted quickly to save the plaintiff, challenging the core premise of her negligence claims. The outcome of this motion could establish key precedents regarding the state's liability for emergency responses during high-stakes testing events.
The state's filing follows lawsuits initiated by Mary Jane Jung on July 29, 2026. Surveillance evidence shows state employees arrived at the scene within one minute, performing CPR and using an automated defibrillator twice.
The players
Mary Jane Jung
She is the 36-year-old plaintiff who filed lawsuits against the state following a medical emergency during an exam.
New York Court of Claims
This is the judicial body where legal proceedings regarding state liability are heard and decided.
Hofstra University
This is the academic institution that hosted the bar exam at its David S. Mack Sports and Exhibition Complex.
The details
Surveillance footage from the David S. Mack Sports and Exhibition Complex shows employees arriving one minute after the emergency began, with additional help arriving 1.5 minutes later. Hofstra security reportedly reached the scene 2.5 minutes after the incident occurred, while test booklets were collected 3.5 minutes into the event.
Timeline
July 30, 2025: Mary Jane Jung suffered a cardiac arrest at the bar exam.
July 29, 2026: Jung filed two lawsuits regarding the medical incident.
September 21, 2026: The Attorney General filed papers to dismiss the lawsuits.
Legal Context
The filing underscores how state entities defend against tort claims by using objective video evidence to counter allegations of professional negligence. It follows standard New York Court of Claims liability protocols for determining the reasonableness of response times during medical emergencies.
The case highlights the importance of institutional readiness and documentation during large-scale public events hosted on state-affiliated properties. Residents may take interest in how security and emergency procedures are verified when incidents occur in high-traffic administrative settings.
The takeaway
This case emphasizes the critical role of surveillance evidence in resolving legal disputes over emergency response times. It serves as a reminder that objective video logs often define the outcome of negligence claims against large institutions.
Further reading
For more on legal proceedings involving local incidents, visit the Accidents section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Newsday.
