Quagge and Reynolds Will Vie for Department 29 Seat
Candidates Alex Quagge and Jacob Reynolds are campaigning for the Department 29 judicial seat in Clark County.
Updated on Oct. 7, 2026 in Criminal Justice
Live Poll
Do you prefer judicial candidates with diverse professional backgrounds over those with traditional experience?
In the upcoming November 2026 election, Clark County prosecutor Alex Quagge and sitting judge Jacob Reynolds will compete for the Department 29 judicial seat. The race focuses on the candidates' differing professional backgrounds and their stated visions for the local court.
Why it matters
The contest allows voters to determine the future direction of the District Court by choosing between Quagge's focus on public trust and Reynolds' emphasis on civil law experience. Both candidates offer distinct experiences gained through their respective careers in law enforcement and the judiciary.
The race centers on the Department 29 seat in the Clark County District Court. Candidates are currently campaigning ahead of the November 2026 election to determine who will fill the position.
The players
Alex Quagge
She is a Clark County prosecutor and an officer in the Army National Guard.
Jacob Reynolds
He is a sitting judge who has served on the bench since his 2023 appointment.
The details
Alex Quagge, an Army National Guard officer and prosecutor, has worked with the Nevada Court of Appeals and the attorney general's office. Jacob Reynolds, who was appointed to the bench in 2023 and elected in 2024, holds law degrees from Brigham Young University and has secured various political and business endorsements.
Timeline
Jacob Reynolds began serving on the bench in 2023.
Alex Quagge joined the Clark County district attorney's office in 2023.
Jacob Reynolds was elected to the bench in 2024.
Legal Context
This race follows the patterns established during the 2024 Clark County judicial election cycle. It reflects the ongoing transition of judicial seats in the region between appointed incumbents and challengers.
The election result will determine who presides over the Department 29 seat and manages the civil and criminal caseloads for residents in the jurisdiction. Voters will decide the direction of the court during the November 2026 balloting process.
The takeaway
Voters should review the professional qualifications and judicial philosophies of both candidates to understand their potential impact on the court system. Assessing these candidates helps ensure the community is informed before the November 2026 election date.
Further reading
For more information on local elections, visit the Criminal Justice section.
Live Poll
Do you prefer judicial candidates with diverse professional backgrounds over those with traditional experience?
