Attorney Sued Santa Fe Over Police License Plate Records
A legal dispute emerged after the city failed to fulfill a public records request for police surveillance data.
Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Law Enforcement
Live Poll
Should your local government be required to publicly disclose details about its police surveillance technology?
Attorney Damon Hudson has filed a lawsuit in state court to compel the City of Santa Fe to release documents regarding automated license plate readers. The legal action follows a records request that remains unfulfilled after ten months.
Why it matters
The lawsuit centers on concerns regarding the extent of city surveillance and the transparency of government data-sharing practices. It highlights the tension between public oversight and the use of automated law enforcement tools.
The lawsuit, filed in state court, seeks the disclosure of contracts, policy violation records, and license plate search logs. The city has yet to provide these documents to Attorney Damon Hudson.
The players
Damon Hudson
Damon Hudson is the attorney representing the legal challenge against the City of Santa Fe.
City of Santa Fe
The City of Santa Fe is the municipal government entity currently being sued over its public record disclosures.
The details
Attorney Damon Hudson initiated the legal challenge to obtain transparency regarding how the City of Santa Fe manages automated license plate scanners. The requested records include data-sharing agreements and historical search logs captured by the technology.
Timeline
November 2025: Damon Hudson submitted the initial records request.
September 2026: The lawsuit was filed against the City of Santa Fe.
Legal Context
This case follows a pattern of litigation regarding the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act as citizens seek more visibility into municipal operations. It reflects a broader trend of legal challenges aimed at increasing transparency for automated surveillance programs.
Residents may see increased scrutiny regarding the city's surveillance budget and policies following the court proceedings. This case could establish a precedent for how quickly the public receives information about municipal technology deployments.
The takeaway
Public transparency remains a critical check on the implementation of municipal technology tools. Citizens and legal advocates continue to use judicial channels to ensure that automated surveillance systems are subject to public oversight.
Further reading
Learn more about local transparency efforts on the Law Enforcement page.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Santa Fe New Mexican.
Live Poll
Should your local government be required to publicly disclose details about its police surveillance technology?
