Schiano Sons Hold Paid Roles on Rutgers Football Staff

Three relatives of the head coach earned a combined $270,000 in salary during the 2026 season.

Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Football

Schiano Sons Hold Paid Roles on Rutgers Football Staff

Live Poll

Does hiring relatives for university staff positions negatively impact your trust in local institutions?

Rutgers University head coach Greg Schiano currently employs his three sons on the football coaching staff. The brothers received a combined salary of $270,000 in 2026 as the team maintains a 1-4 overall record.

Why it matters

The hiring has drawn scrutiny regarding nepotism and team management during a difficult season. Rutgers officials maintain that the hiring process followed all university policies.

The three brothers earn a combined $270,000, which accounts for roughly 2% of the $14 million Rutgers spent on support staff in 2024. Rutgers is the only Power Four program currently employing more than two relatives of its head coach.

The players

Greg Schiano

He is the head coach of the Rutgers University football team.

Joseph Schiano

He serves as the director of player personnel for the Rutgers football program.

Matthew Schiano

He serves as an assistant coach for quarterbacks at Rutgers.

Johnathan Schiano

He serves as an assistant coach for safeties at Rutgers.

The details

Joseph Schiano serves as director of player personnel, while Matthew and Johnathan Schiano work as assistant coaches for quarterbacks and safeties. University records indicate that staff members related to coaches report to sport administrators to ensure adherence to nepotism guidelines.

Joseph Schiano joined the football program in 2020.
Rutgers spent $14 million on support staff in 2024.
The brothers combined for a $255,000 payroll in 2025.
Rutgers suffered a 47-15 loss to Indiana on October 3, 2026.
The three sons collected $270,000 in total compensation in 2026.

Season Trajectory

The staff composition remains a focal point as the team struggles to find momentum during a challenging 2026 season. This staffing structure puts additional pressure on the program's leadership to improve on-field performance following a 1-4 start.

The current coaching staff must reverse a 1-4 record to salvage the team's standing in the conference. Financial figures indicate the university continues to invest heavily in support personnel despite current performance results.

The takeaway

Staffing decisions at major college programs are frequently subject to public review, especially when performance goals are not met. Transparency regarding hiring practices remains a priority for fans and university stakeholders alike.