Eighth Circuit Upheld Creighton University Verdict
The court ruled that the university did not discriminate against a former pharmacy student.
Updated on Sept. 18, 2026 in Special Education
Live Poll
Do you believe universities should be held strictly liable for failures to provide student disability accommodations?
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has affirmed a jury verdict in favor of Creighton University. The ruling concludes that former pharmacy student Kelli Florek failed to prove her claims of disability discrimination.
Why it matters
The decision clarifies the legal threshold for universities regarding disability accommodation requests in distance education programs. It upholds the university's position that it fulfilled its obligations to the student.
Kelli Florek, a student in the Omaha-based university's pharmacy program, alleged that Creighton failed to meet accommodation requests following a concussion. The court found that she did not provide sufficient proof to overturn the jury verdict.
The players
Creighton University
A private Jesuit research university based in Omaha that was the defendant in the discrimination lawsuit.
Kelli Florek
A former pharmacy student who claimed she was dismissed from a distance education program due to discrimination.
Jonathan A. Kobes
A judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit who authored the opinion in this case.
The details
Kelli Florek claimed she faced disability discrimination and dismissal from the program after seeking specific academic adjustments. The appellate court, in an opinion written by Judge Jonathan A. Kobes, declined to vacate the earlier findings that favored the university.
Timeline
September 11, 2026: Judge Jonathan A. Kobes authored the court opinion.
September 18, 2026: This news story was published.
The Big Picture
The ruling underscores the evolving legal standards for institutional compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act within online academic environments. It follows a established pattern in federal courts that favors university autonomy when reasonable accommodation processes are followed.
This verdict provides local students and administrators in Omaha with clearer expectations regarding the documentation and fulfillment of disability accommodations. It reinforces the importance for students of maintaining detailed records when interacting with university disability services.
The takeaway
Students should ensure they fully understand the formal processes for requesting academic accommodations as defined in their university handbooks. Documenting all interactions with disability services can prove essential if academic disputes arise during a program.
Further reading
For more context on how institutions manage support requirements, read about Special Education policies.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.
Live Poll
Do you believe universities should be held strictly liable for failures to provide student disability accommodations?
