NDSU Student Placed Second in Competition
North Dakota State University doctoral student Paul Agada earned honors for his study on X's Community Notes.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Internet

Live Poll
Do you trust social media users more than institutional gatekeepers to identify misleading online content?
Paul Agada, a communication doctoral student at North Dakota State University, placed as the first runner-up in the 2026 Westphal Student Paper Competition. The competition was organized by the Iowa Communication Association.
Why it matters
The research is timely as it addresses growing concerns regarding the rapid spread of misinformation on social media platforms. By studying user perceptions, the work highlights the role of collaborative context tools in shaping online behavior.
The study utilized a specific analytical framework to evaluate the credibility and influence of the Community Notes feature on X. It specifically examined how users perceive the accuracy of context added by peers versus traditional moderation.
The players
Paul Agada
He is a doctoral student in the communication department at North Dakota State University.
North Dakota State University
It is a public research university located in Fargo that supports doctoral-level studies in communication.
Iowa Communication Association
This professional organization convenes the annual Westphal Student Paper Competition to promote scholarly research.
The details
Agada’s winning paper provided an in-depth analysis of user perceptions regarding the Community Notes feature, which allows users to append context to posts. The study explored whether this crowdsourced information effectively mitigates the spread of misinformation and impacts general online behavior.
Timeline
The Westphal Student Paper Competition was held in 2026.
The Tech Race
The study follows the scholarly tradition of communication research fostered by the Iowa Communication Association. This work bridges the gap between academic theory and the practical challenges of moderating global social media platforms.
For users of social media, this research clarifies how features like Community Notes can change how we interpret the information on our feeds. It suggests that users should be increasingly aware of how context provided by other people influences their trust in specific posts.
The takeaway
The research serves as a reminder that users play an active role in curbing misinformation by engaging with platform context tools. Readers can benefit from critically evaluating Community Notes rather than accepting them as objective truth.
Further reading
For more on the evolving digital landscape, see our coverage of Internet.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Punch Newspapers.
Live Poll
Do you trust social media users more than institutional gatekeepers to identify misleading online content?









