F5 Project Signed Compliance Agreement After Investigation
The Fargo-based nonprofit will remain under state oversight for five years following allegations of self-dealing.
Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Philanthropy

Live Poll
Should nonprofits receiving taxpayer funds be subject to stricter government oversight?
The F5 Project has entered into a compliance agreement with the state of North Dakota to resolve an investigation into illegal self-dealing. The probe revealed that the nonprofit provided personal loans to leadership and engaged in real estate transactions that created conflicts of interest.
Why it matters
The settlement highlights the state's efforts to enforce accountability for nonprofits receiving taxpayer support. By opting for civil oversight rather than criminal charges, officials aim to establish a more rigorous culture of compliance within the sector.
The F5 Project has received more than $11 million in taxpayer funds since its founding in 2017. The organization is currently governed by a board of eight members.
The players
Adam Martin
He is a leader at the F5 Project who received personal loans deemed to be illegal self-dealing by state investigators.
Scott College
He is a leader at the F5 Project identified in the state investigation as a recipient of illegal personal loans.
F5 Project
This Fargo-based nonprofit organization provides services and has received over $11 million in state funding since 2017.
The details
The state's Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division investigated the organization's tax filings and real estate deals. While the F5 Project agreed to state-mandated oversight, it specifically does not admit or deny the allegations outlined in the petition filed at the Cass County Courthouse.
Timeline
The F5 Project was founded in 2017.
Columnist Rob Port reported on the F5 loan transactions in January 2026.
The Attorney General announced the compliance agreement on September 23, 2026.
The organization will remain under state oversight for the next five years.
Market Landscape
This agreement reflects a broader effort by state regulators to increase scrutiny of nonprofits that rely heavily on public funding. It establishes a pattern of civil enforcement designed to curb conflicts of interest among leadership teams in the regional social services sector.
Residents should be aware that their tax contributions remain under heightened state monitoring to ensure funds are used for their intended public purposes. The agreement ensures that the F5 Project must now operate under a stricter framework to maintain its eligibility for state support.
The takeaway
Nonprofit organizations must maintain transparent governance practices to protect both their mission and their access to public resources. Organizations that prioritize internal compliance can avoid the potential for state dissolution and preserve community trust.
What happens next
The F5 Project must adhere to the terms of the five-year oversight agreement, or it could face potential dissolution if it fails to maintain compliance with the Attorney General's requirements.
Further reading
Learn more about local nonprofit governance trends on the Fargo Philanthropy page.
Live Poll
Should nonprofits receiving taxpayer funds be subject to stricter government oversight?










