UNC Police Ended Automatic Camera Data Sharing
The department disabled a data-sharing feature of its Flock camera network following concerns over potential misuse.
Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Law Enforcement

Live Poll
Should local police agencies be allowed to automatically share surveillance data with other law enforcement?
UNC Police announced in October 2026 that the agency ended automatic data-sharing with outside law enforcement via its Flock camera system. The decision to disable the feature was finalized in September 2026.
Why it matters
The move reflects mounting concerns regarding the privacy of surveillance data and the potential for unauthorized use. By requiring agencies to request information directly, the department maintains stricter control over its camera network records.
UNC Police confirmed the termination of automatic data sharing, which was first established under a 2024 contract with Flock. The department averages 25 to 30 searches per month using the technology.
The players
Brian James
Brian James is the Police Chief at UNC who formally announced the policy shift regarding surveillance technology.
UNC Police
UNC Police is the law enforcement agency responsible for campus security and the management of the university surveillance network.
Flock
Flock is a technology company that provides automated license plate recognition and surveillance camera systems to law enforcement agencies.
The details
UNC Police Chief Brian James stated that the decision to deactivate the automatic sharing feature was prompted by public rhetoric and fears regarding data misuse. Outside agencies must now submit direct requests to UNC Police for specific information rather than accessing the camera system independently.
Timeline
2024: UNC Police signed the contract for the Flock camera system.
September 2026: The department decided to disable the automatic data-sharing feature.
October 5, 2026: Chief Brian James announced the policy change.
Legal Context
The move reflects a broader trend among regional agencies to limit the scope of automated surveillance as part of Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Departments are increasingly scaling back third-party access to avoid legal scrutiny.
Residents in the area may see a change in how local law enforcement coordinates with regional agencies regarding campus security data. This policy ensures that personal surveillance information is subject to direct internal review before being shared externally.
The takeaway
Limiting automated data sharing allows departments to maintain greater oversight and transparency regarding who accesses surveillance footage. Organizations should regularly audit third-party access agreements to ensure they align with evolving public privacy expectations.
Further reading
Learn more about local oversight in the Chapel Hill Law Enforcement section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Daily Tar Heel.
Live Poll
Should local police agencies be allowed to automatically share surveillance data with other law enforcement?










