Jackson Settles Lawsuit With Kia and Hyundai

The city reached a legal agreement with the automakers after a surge in vehicle thefts involving certain models.

Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Car Types

Jackson Settles Lawsuit With Kia and Hyundai

Live Poll

Should cities pursue legal action against automakers over vehicle security flaws?

Jackson reached a settlement with Kia America Incorporated and Hyundai North America regarding a lawsuit over missing anti-theft technology. The city will receive approximately $100,000 as part of the total $178,556.05 agreement.

Why it matters

The lawsuit stems from concerns that the lack of standard anti-theft systems in specific vehicles fueled a local spike in auto thefts. This settlement addresses the citys legal claims that the manufacturers failed to protect vehicle owners from these security vulnerabilities.

In 2023, 300 Kia and Hyundai vehicles were stolen within Jackson. The city previously filed suit citing the manufacturers failure to install necessary anti-theft technology.

The players

Kia America Incorporated

This is a major automotive manufacturer that faced legal challenges regarding vehicle security features.

Hyundai North America

This subsidiary of the South Korean automotive group was a central defendant in the citys anti-theft lawsuit.

Tatum and Wade PLLC

This law firm provided professional legal representation for the city of Jackson during the proceedings.

The details

The litigation moved from Hinds County Chancery Court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi and eventually the California Central District Court. The legal firm Tatum and Wade PLLC represented the city throughout these proceedings.

Timeline

  1. In 2023, 300 Kia and Hyundai vehicles were reported stolen in Jackson.

  2. The city of Jackson filed the lawsuit against the automakers in 2025.

  3. The City Council approved the settlement agreement on October 20, 2026.

Roadmap

This settlement highlights the industry-wide shift toward stricter vehicle security standards as manufacturers face increasing litigation over past design oversights. It underscores the broader transition as automakers prioritize modernized anti-theft technology to remain competitive and avoid future liability.

Residents of Jackson may see the settlement funds applied to local security initiatives or city-managed crime reduction programs. Vehicle owners continue to navigate the practical realities of protecting models that lack factory-installed security upgrades.

The takeaway

Vehicle owners should check with authorized dealerships to confirm if their specific models qualify for anti-theft software updates or hardware security enhancements. Staying proactive with secondary locking devices remains the best defense for owners of vehicles identified as high-risk for theft.

Further reading

For additional context on automotive safety and design, visit Car Types.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Wlbt.

Live Poll

Should cities pursue legal action against automakers over vehicle security flaws?