Mississippi Court Upholds Michigan Judgment Against Business
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed that a Michigan judgment over unfulfilled furniture orders can be enforced in the state.
Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Criminal Justice
Live Poll
Should online sellers be held accountable in states where their customers live?
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling allowing enforcement of a Michigan judgment against a Mississippi man and his drop-shipping business. The judgment totals more than $100,000 in damages, costs, and fees.
Why it matters
The ruling lets Michigan's Attorney General seek help from Mississippi trial courts to collect a judgment against defendants located in Mississippi. It shows that out-of-state consumer protection judgments can be enforced across state lines in Mississippi.
The Michigan judgment of more than $100,000 entered in April 2025 is now enforceable in Mississippi trial courts. Whether any funds have been recovered or which collection methods will be used has not been reported.
The players
Dana Nessel
Michigan Attorney General who filed the class-action lawsuit and is pursuing collection of the judgment.
Ingham County 30th Circuit Court
Michigan trial court that entered the judgment against the man and his company in April 2025.
The details
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel sued the man and his company in January 2024 under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, alleging they accepted payments on furniture orders and never delivered the goods or refunded customers. The defendants tried to block enforcement of the Michigan judgment in Mississippi, but state courts rejected that effort.
Timeline
January 2024: Nessel files class-action lawsuit against the man and his business.
April 2025: Ingham County's 30th Circuit Court enters judgment exceeding $100,000.
November 3, 2026: Mississippi Supreme Court affirms enforcement of the judgment.
Legal Context
The case applies the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, which allows state attorneys general to bring class actions against deceptive businesses. Its enforcement across state lines shows how state consumer protection judgments can be carried into other jurisdictions.
Consumers who paid for orders from out-of-state sellers may find that state court judgments can be enforced in other states. Residents who have a dispute with a business should note that their state attorney general may pursue relief on their behalf.
The takeaway
Out-of-state consumer judgments can follow a business into other states, so buyers should keep records of payments and orders. Checking whether a seller has been sued by a state attorney general can help before paying for goods that are not yet delivered.
Further reading
For more on how courts handle cases like this, see Criminal Justice coverage.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Live Poll
Should online sellers be held accountable in states where their customers live?
