Mississippi Replaced Legislative Election System in 2020
The state adopted mandatory runoff elections for statewide offices, ending a process dating back to 1890.
Updated on Sept. 20, 2026 in Elections

Live Poll
Should states mandate runoff elections in general elections if no candidate secures a majority?
In 2020, the Mississippi Legislature replaced a century-old electoral process that allowed the state House to select statewide officeholders. The change followed the removal of Jim Crow era constitutional provisions.
Why it matters
The legislative move updated the state constitution to require majority-vote outcomes for state offices, moving away from a process established in 1890 that lacked a mandatory public runoff.
The 2020 constitutional amendment mandate replaced the 1890 process that governed the election of statewide officials. Mississippi now requires runoff elections for state offices if no candidate secures a majority, though this rule does not apply to federal offices.
The players
Mississippi Legislature
The state body responsible for legislative changes and the adoption of the 2020 constitutional amendment.
The details
The legislature moved to replace the House-led selection process to eliminate provisions rooted in the state's 1890 constitution. This shift established that statewide officeholders must now be chosen via runoff elections when no candidate receives a majority of the vote.
Timeline
1890: Provisions regarding electoral processes were added to the constitution.
1960s: Georgia imposed its runoff election system.
2020: Mississippi Legislature replaced the House electoral process with runoffs.
November 3: U.S. Senate election in Mississippi occurs.
Political Context
The transition to a runoff-based system follows a broader move to modernize election procedures that were initially codified during the Jim Crow era. Opposition to such changes in various states often centers on debates regarding legislative autonomy versus direct voter mandates.
Voters now participate in mandatory runoffs for state offices whenever no candidate captures a majority of the general vote. This change ensures that statewide representatives must secure a clear mandate from the electorate rather than relying on legislative selection processes.
The takeaway
Mississippi's adoption of the runoff system reflects a growing regional standard for determining state-level election winners. Residents should prepare for potential secondary voting cycles in local elections when no clear majority emerges initially.
Further reading
Learn more about the state's electoral history in Mississippi Elections.
Source note: This article includes information reported by DeSoto County News.
Live Poll
Should states mandate runoff elections in general elections if no candidate secures a majority?










