Missouri Supreme Court Reviews Reporter Contempt Case
The court hears oral arguments regarding a journalist sentenced to jail time for unauthorized cellphone use in a courtroom.
Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Criminal Justice
Live Poll
Should courts have the authority to jail reporters who violate courtroom technology and recording restrictions?
The Missouri Supreme Court is reviewing a contempt of court case involving reporter Cathi Utley, who was sentenced to five days at the Franklin County Detention Center. The proceedings follow allegations that Utley violated courtroom decorum orders during a murder trial by using a cellphone.
Why it matters
The case centers on the balance between judicial authority to enforce courtroom decorum and the ability of the press to report on criminal proceedings. The Missouri Press Association has intervened in the matter, highlighting concerns regarding the application of bans on electronic devices in legal settings.
Cathi Utley was initially sentenced to a 5-day term at the Franklin County Detention Center after recording a 47-second video. She was later released on her own recognizance by the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District.
The players
Cathi Utley
She is a reporter whose case regarding courtroom cellphone use is being reviewed by the state supreme court.
Missouri Press Association
The organization filed an amicus brief to advocate for media interests regarding judicial decorum and reporting access.
Steven M. Pelton
He is the named respondent in the Missouri Supreme Court review case filed by Cathi Utley.
The details
Utley acknowledged bringing her cellphone into the trial after her camera equipment malfunctioned during a break. The trial court rejected motions from her legal counsel to set aside the contempt judgment and separate the contempt proceeding from the murder trial.
Timeline
December 4, 2025: Court enters the First Amended Decorum Order.
January 2026: The contempt incident occurs during a criminal trial.
October 28, 2026: The Missouri Supreme Court hears oral arguments.
Legal Context
The dispute centers on the boundaries of the Missouri First Amended Decorum Order, which restricts recording devices in judicial proceedings. This case marks a significant challenge to the enforcement of decorum standards in high-profile criminal trials.
Residents should remain aware that courtroom decorum orders strictly prohibit the use of cellphones and recording devices. Violating these judicial mandates can lead to immediate incarceration for contempt of court, regardless of professional affiliation.
The takeaway
This case illustrates the strict enforcement of rules regarding electronic devices inside courtrooms during ongoing criminal trials. Reporters and the public are reminded that adherence to judge-issued decorum orders is mandatory to avoid severe legal sanctions.
Further reading
Learn more about local legal challenges in the Criminal Justice section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Missouri Lawyers Media.
Live Poll
Should courts have the authority to jail reporters who violate courtroom technology and recording restrictions?
