Ron Perlman Urged University to End Monkey Experiments
The actor submitted an open letter calling for an end to invasive primate testing at the University of Minnesota.
Updated on Sept. 28, 2026 in Veterinary Medicine

Live Poll
Should universities end animal experimentation in favor of modern human-based technologies?
Actor and University of Minnesota alumnus Ron Perlman has publicly demanded that the institution cease invasive monkey experimentation. Perlman, working alongside People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, urged university president Rebecca Cunningham to retire surviving research monkeys to sanctuaries.
Why it matters
The campaign highlights growing ethical concerns regarding the use of invasive brain surgeries in laboratory research. Advocates argue that the university's current practices are increasingly out of step with modern trends in biomedical science.
Laboratory records have documented instances of infections and hardware device failures among monkeys subjected to skull removal and electrode implantation. These procedures are currently conducted at the University of Minnesota facilities.
The players
Ron Perlman
He is an American actor known for his film and television work and is a 1973 graduate of the University of Minnesota.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
It is a prominent animal rights organization that advocates for the humane treatment of animals in research and other industries.
Rebecca Cunningham
She serves as the president of the University of Minnesota.
Geoff Ghose
He was a researcher previously suspended from conducting monkey-related studies at the university.
The details
Researchers at the university perform invasive brain surgeries on monkeys by removing portions of their skulls to implant metal devices and electrodes. Perlman cited these procedures as cruel and called for the immediate transfer of the animals to ethical sanctuaries.
Timeline
Ron Perlman graduated from the University of Minnesota in 1973.
The open letter calling for an end to the research was published on September 28, 2026.
Roadmap
This protest aligns with the broader push toward non-animal alternative models in biomedical research. It reflects an evolving standard where historical laboratory practices face increasing scrutiny from both the public and the scientific community.
The controversy highlights the intersection of public institutional practices and animal welfare expectations within the local community. Residents and students may see increased advocacy visibility as the debate over the university's research methodology continues.
The takeaway
The situation demonstrates how high-profile public figures can influence institutional policy by leveraging their platform as alumni. It serves as a reminder of the rising influence of ethical advocacy in the oversight of academic and medical research facilities.
Further reading
Learn more about the latest standards in the Veterinary Medicine field.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Collider.
Live Poll
Should universities end animal experimentation in favor of modern human-based technologies?










