Minnesota Lawmakers Question Hiring for Inspector General
Legislators express concern over potential staff hiring before an inspector general is selected for the new office.
Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Legislative Policy
Live Poll
Do you trust state agencies to operate independently from the governor's office?
Lawmakers are criticizing the administration over job postings for the Office of Inspector General in Minnesota. Critics argue that hiring staff before an inspector general is selected undermines the independence of the new office.
Why it matters
The law creating the Office of Inspector General mandates that the agency operates free from political influence. Lawmakers suggest that filling staff roles prior to appointing the inspector general may compromise this required independence.
The governor's office maintains that hiring processes are restricted solely to the inspector general role. The law requires that any eventual inspector general be confirmed by the Senate.
The players
Aric Putnam
Aric Putnam is a state senator representing a district including St. Cloud and co-authored the law that created the Office of Inspector General.
Jim Nash
Jim Nash is a state representative who serves as a member of the Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission.
Tom Sexton
Tom Sexton is a state representative and a member of the Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission.
The details
Legislators serving on the Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission, including Representatives Jim Nash and Tom Sexton and Senator Aric Putnam, raised concerns regarding the recruitment process. The administration has denied that it is currently hiring for any positions within the office other than the inspector general.
Timeline
The Senate is scheduled to confirm the inspector general in 2027.
Political Context
Opponents of the administration argue that early staffing moves prioritize bureaucratic control over the legislative mandate for an independent oversight body. Critics claim this approach ignores the governance structure established by the legislation creating the Office of Inspector General.
The ongoing disagreement over staffing practices directly impacts the timeline for when the state will have an active inspector general providing oversight. Citizens should note that the office currently remains without a leader while political debate over the hiring process continues.
The takeaway
Maintaining independent oversight is a key pillar of legislative reform in state government. Residents should monitor the 2027 confirmation process to see how the inspector general role is ultimately filled.
Further reading
Read more about ongoing oversight efforts in the Legislative Policy section.
Live Poll
Do you trust state agencies to operate independently from the governor's office?
