Federal Agents Allegedly Misused Pepper Spray in 2025
Reports indicate federal agents used MK-9 spray against protesters and observers during Operation Metro Surge.
Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Law Enforcement

Live Poll
Do you believe federal agents should face stricter regulations for using chemical sprays on protesters?
Federal agents allegedly deployed MK-9 pepper spray at point-blank range at least 44 times during the 2025 Operation Metro Surge. The incidents occurred across several Minnesota locations, including Minneapolis, St. Paul, Fort Snelling, and Owatonna.
Why it matters
The usage of these chemical munitions sparked a legal challenge from the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, which collected over 100 sworn declarations from those who encountered the spray.
A federal judge dismissed an ACLU lawsuit regarding the operation because the initiative concluded. The investigation into the 44 documented instances of alleged misuse followed the filing of over 100 sworn declarations.
The players
American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota
This civil rights organization filed over 100 sworn declarations to challenge the use of force during the operation.
Department of Homeland Security
This federal agency oversaw the procurement of chemical munitions and the conduct of federal agents during the operation.
Quantico Tactical
This company acted as the supplier for the $4.7 million in chemical munitions purchased by federal authorities in 2025.
The details
Agents reportedly deployed the MK-9 chemical spray at close range against protesters and observers without providing audible warnings. These incidents took place throughout various Minnesota locations, drawing scrutiny over standard deployment safety protocols.
Timeline
In 2025, the Department of Homeland Security spent $4.7 million on chemical munitions.
Legal Context
The conduct during Operation Metro Surge highlights the ongoing tension between federal law enforcement tactics and the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure. The reported actions mark a departure from established standards for the use of non-lethal force in domestic policing.
The reported incidents resulted in safety concerns for community members and protesters who were subjected to chemical agents without warning. Residents are advised to monitor official updates regarding federal oversight and policy reforms in the wake of these allegations.
The takeaway
The dismissal of the lawsuit highlights the difficulty in seeking legal remedies for grievances tied to terminated federal operations. Citizens should be aware of the specific regulations governing the use of non-lethal deterrents during public demonstrations.
Further reading
For more information on state law enforcement activities, visit the Law Enforcement section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul.
Live Poll
Do you believe federal agents should face stricter regulations for using chemical sprays on protesters?










