Kalamazoo Adopted New Surveillance Purchasing Policy
The City Commission will now require a public vote for all surveillance technology contracts.
Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in City Hall

Live Poll
Should your local government be required to publicly approve all surveillance technology contracts?
Kalamazoo commissioners voted 5-2 to pass a policy mandating public approval for all surveillance technology contracts. The move follows significant public pressure regarding the city’s use of license plate readers.
Why it matters
The change directly addresses local calls for transparency after residents challenged the city's use of surveillance tools. Commissioners cited consistent public outcry as the primary driver for the new oversight requirements.
The city previously approved a 12-month Flock camera contract worth $99,900, just under the former threshold requiring commission approval. Over 1,000 residents signed a petition this year calling for the removal of these systems.
The players
Kalamazoo City Commission
This is the primary legislative body responsible for governing the city of Kalamazoo, Michigan.
The details
The new policy ensures that all future contracts for biometric technology and license plate readers must go before the commission for a public vote. This replaces a previous system that permitted administrative approvals for smaller surveillance acquisitions.
Timeline
In 2021, the city approved its initial contract for 35 Flock cameras.
Earlier in 2026, over 1,000 people signed a petition to remove the cameras.
In July 2026, the city renewed the existing Flock camera contract for one year.
In August 2026, roughly 80 people protested outside of City Hall.
On September 21, 2026, the commission adopted the new surveillance purchasing policy.
Political Context
The commission's vote represents a local administrative step to add oversight layers to surveillance systems that privacy advocates argue challenge the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. Opposition voices have consistently argued that these automated tracking technologies lack sufficient checks on government reach into private life.
Residents can now expect a formal public hearing and commission vote before any new or renewed surveillance equipment is authorized for use. This process provides a consistent platform for citizens to voice concerns regarding specific technology deployments before they take effect.
The takeaway
This policy change shifts the power balance by forcing municipal surveillance budgets into the public record. Residents looking to influence future contracts should prepare to participate in upcoming commission meetings where these specific technology agreements will be presented for a vote.
Further reading
For more information on local governance, visit City Hall.
Live Poll
Should your local government be required to publicly approve all surveillance technology contracts?










