Michigan Keeps Drone Ban for Tracking Game

The state's prohibition on drones to locate wounded or dead game remains in force after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge.

Updated on Nov. 4, 2026 in Hunting

Screen-print poster illustration of a single drone hovering over a wooded clearing in warm mustard and teal tones, evoking the debate over drone use in hunting.
Michigan will keep its ban on using drones to locate wounded or dead game after the U.S. Supreme Court declined in June to hear a challenge brought by Mike Yoder and the Pacific Legal Foundation. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should Michigan allow drones to help hunters recover wounded or dead deer?

Michigan continues to ban the use of drones to track wounded or dead game. The U.S. Supreme Court declined in June 2026 to hear a challenge to the prohibition brought by Mike Yoder of Drone Deer Recovery and the Pacific Legal Foundation.

Why it matters

The ruling leaves in place a state rule that treats drone searches for downed game as a form of taking wildlife, affecting hunters who want to recover animals more quickly. The case reflects an ongoing debate over fair chase and the use of technology in hunting.

Michigan law defines take to include following or pursuing wildlife, and the Department of Natural Resources says a drone search for wounded or dead game counts as a take. Dogs remain permitted for the same tracking purpose, and the state has not yet acted on a recommendation to allow recovery drones.

The players

Mike Yoder

Yoder is the founder of Drone Deer Recovery who challenged Michigan's ban on drone-assisted deer recovery in court.

Pacific Legal Foundation

The Pacific Legal Foundation is a public-interest law firm that represented Yoder in litigation against the Michigan drone ban.

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is the state agency that enforces wildlife laws and interprets the drone prohibition as a form of taking game.

The details

Michigan law prohibits using drones to take game or fish, and the ban applies to turkeys and other game. Mike Yoder of Drone Deer Recovery and the Pacific Legal Foundation sued, but the Sixth Circuit ruled against them in 2025.

Timeline

  1. 2025: The Sixth Circuit ruled against the drone-recovery challengers.

  2. June 2026: The Supreme Court declined to hear the drone-ban case.

Legal Context

The dispute centers on Michigan's wildlife code definition of take, which the state applies to drone searches for wounded game. The ruling extends an existing fair-chase framework to a newer technology that hunters increasingly use.

Michigan hunters cannot use drones to locate wounded or dead game, so recovery still depends on tracking dogs and traditional search methods. The rule applies to turkeys and other game as well as deer.

The takeaway

Hunters in Michigan should confirm current Department of Natural Resources rules before using any technology to search for game. The ban remains in effect despite the legal challenge.

Further reading

Explore more on hunting regulations and how states define fair chase.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Cars 108.

Live Poll

Should Michigan allow drones to help hunters recover wounded or dead deer?