Newsmax Commentator Endorses Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan
Andrew Napolitano backed the Democratic candidate while criticizing Mike Rogers over war and civil liberties.
Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Commentary
Live Poll
Do you trust political endorsements from media commentators when they conflict with their network's typical stance?
Newsmax commentator Andrew Napolitano has officially endorsed Abdul El-Sayed for the U.S. Senate race in Michigan. Napolitano expressed support for the Democrat despite noting policy disagreements on taxes.
Why it matters
The endorsement highlights Napolitano's alignment with El-Sayed on foreign policy and constitutional issues, distinguishing their shared stance from that of Republican candidate Mike Rogers.
Abdul El-Sayed is currently leading in multiple polls aggregated by The New York Times. The status of his lead remains subject to late-cycle shifts in voter sentiment.
The players
Andrew Napolitano
He is a Newsmax commentator and senior judicial analyst.
Abdul El-Sayed
He is a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan.
Mike Rogers
He is the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan.
Donald Trump
The current President of the United States who has labeled El-Sayed a communist and jihadist.
Katie Halper
She is the host who conducted the interview with Andrew Napolitano.
The details
Napolitano, a senior judicial analyst, announced his preference for El-Sayed during an interview with Katie Halper. He criticized Republican candidate Mike Rogers, describing him as a war-loving and Constitution-hating thug.
Timeline
October 20, 2026: The interview is scheduled for release on YouTube.
Political Context
Critics, including President Donald Trump, maintain that El-Sayed holds extreme positions, often describing him as a communist and jihadist. This opposition highlights the partisan divide surrounding El-Sayed's candidacy as he leads in recent polling.
Voters in Michigan must weigh these prominent endorsements as the Senate race enters its final stages. The rhetoric from both sides underscores the significant policy differences voters face regarding civil liberties and foreign policy.
The takeaway
This endorsement illustrates how shared concerns over constitutional authority can bridge traditional party divides. Voters should evaluate how these competing perspectives on foreign policy align with their own legislative priorities.
Further reading
For more analysis on the race, see Michigan Commentary.
Source note: This article includes information reported by HuffPost.
Live Poll
Do you trust political endorsements from media commentators when they conflict with their network's typical stance?
