Michigan Court Upheld Commercial Loan Enforcement
A federal court ruled that a $10 million promissory note is enforceable under Michigan state law.
Updated on Oct. 14, 2026 in Commercial
Live Poll
Should the law allow lenders to charge any interest rate on large commercial real estate loans?
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan granted partial summary judgment in a commercial loan dispute. The ruling enforces a $10 million promissory note after rejecting the defendants' usury and wrongful-conduct defenses.
Why it matters
The decision clarifies the application of Michigan's statutory interest rate exceptions for commercial lending. It confirms that loans exceeding $100,000 secured by non-residential real property remain enforceable under state law.
The court issued a 16-page opinion determining that the $10 million loan complied with Mich. Comp. Laws § 438.31c(11). This statute allows for specific interest rates on commercial loans above a $100,000 minimum.
The players
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
This federal judicial body has jurisdiction over civil and criminal matters within the western portion of the state of Michigan.
Private Financing Alternatives LLC
This entity is the plaintiff involved in the commercial loan enforcement litigation.
Walloon Lake Holdings LLC
This company is the defendant in the legal dispute concerning the enforceability of a promissory note.
The details
In the case of Private Financing Alternatives LLC v. Walloon Lake Holdings LLC, the court evaluated the loan documents and the non-residential real property securing the lien. The judge concluded that the borrower's defenses regarding usury were invalid based on statutory interest rate provisions.
Timeline
October 14, 2026: The court issued the written opinion in the legal case.
Culture Shift
This ruling highlights how courts interpret Mich. Comp. Laws § 438.31c(11) to balance commercial contract enforcement with state-level lending regulations. It underscores the trend of upholding high-value commercial loan terms that meet defined statutory criteria for non-residential security.
Business owners and commercial borrowers in the region should note that loan agreements exceeding the $100,000 threshold are subject to these specific state interest rate rules. This decision confirms that contractual terms for commercial properties generally remain enforceable even when challenged by usury arguments.
The takeaway
Commercial entities should ensure that loan documents explicitly account for state-specific statutory exceptions regarding interest rates and real property security. Consulting with legal counsel on these thresholds is essential to confirm that agreements remain binding in the event of a dispute.
Further reading
For more information on legal standards in real estate, visit Michigan Commercial.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Live Poll
Should the law allow lenders to charge any interest rate on large commercial real estate loans?
