Michigan Court Reversed Premises Liability Ruling
An appellate court ruled that a worker injured by caustic soda may proceed with a negligence lawsuit against a facility.
Updated on Sept. 30, 2026 in Accidents
The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed a summary disposition granted to EES Coke Battery, LLC in a premises liability case involving an injured worker. Judges found the plaintiff was an invitee, meaning the company owed him a common-law duty of care.
Why it matters
The decision clarifies the legal obligations of facility owners toward contracted workers. By remanding the case, the court ensures that issues of duty, breach, and proximate cause will be evaluated further at the trial level.
The Michigan Court of Appeals remanded the lawsuit for further proceedings following its decision to vacate the lower court's summary disposition. The case will now re-examine claims regarding breach and proximate cause in the trial court.
The players
Hossam Alaquie
He is the plaintiff who filed a premises liability action after sustaining injuries from a caustic soda spray at a facility.
EES Coke Battery, LLC
This entity operates the facility where the incident occurred and is the defendant in the premises liability lawsuit.
The details
Hossam Alaquie was injured when caustic soda sprayed into his eyes while he disconnected a pressurized hose at the EES facility. Although the plaintiff was not wearing personal protection equipment, the court noted an EES employee allegedly confirmed the internal storage valve was open when it was actually closed.
Timeline
September 29, 2026: The appellate court issued its decision.
Legal Context
This reversal highlights the scrutiny applied to summary disposition motions under MCR 2.116(C)(10) in Michigan premises liability cases. It reflects a broader judicial shift toward ensuring disputed facts regarding site safety and duty of care are fully adjudicated at trial.
The ruling serves as a reminder to Michigan businesses regarding the legal necessity of maintaining clear safety communication with third-party contractors. Local residents and workers should note that facility owners may face increased liability if staff provide inaccurate information regarding site hazards.
The takeaway
Property owners should ensure robust safety protocols and clear communication standards are maintained to protect both employees and contractors. Establishing clear guidelines can prevent negligence claims and improve safety outcomes for everyone on site.
Further reading
For more on legal developments, visit the Michigan Accidents section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
