Senator Peters Demanded Pentagon PFAS Cleanup
Senator Gary Peters called on the Department of Defense to address ongoing delays in toxic chemical remediation at military sites.
Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Military

Live Poll
Is the federal government moving fast enough to clean up hazardous toxic chemical sites?
Senator Gary Peters has formally requested that the Department of Defense explain delays in cleaning up PFAS contamination at military installations. The move comes as part of ongoing pressure from the senator to protect residents and ecosystems from the harmful chemicals.
Why it matters
The Department of Defense has faced criticism for stalling remediation efforts, which continues to pose risks to the health of nearby communities and the surrounding environment in Michigan and beyond.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provided $10 billion in federal funding for PFAS remediation efforts. The 2025 national defense bill additionally mandated the creation of a PFAS transparency dashboard and the provision of alternative drinking water.
The players
Gary Peters
Gary Peters is a U.S. Senator representing the state of Michigan.
Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth is the U.S. Secretary of Defense who received a formal letter regarding remediation delays.
The details
Senator Peters sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth demanding accountability for the cleanup delays that persist at military installations. His office also highlighted the role of the Preventing PFAS Runoff at Airports Act, which utilizes FAA funding to deploy non-PFAS discharging testing equipment.
Timeline
September 2018: Senator Peters convened the first Senate PFAS hearing.
November 2018: A PFAS field summit was held in Grand Rapids.
2021: Senator Peters convened a hearing on military PFAS exposure.
2022: A field hearing on PFAS took place in East Lansing.
September 24, 2026: Senator Peters released a video statement regarding the cleanup demands.
Political Context
Opposing viewpoints have often centered on the technical feasibility and funding prioritization of military site remediation. Critics of aggressive timelines point to the immense logistical challenges of retrofitting legacy military infrastructure to meet updated environmental standards.
Residents living near contaminated military sites may see shifts in local water safety protocols as the Department of Defense faces renewed pressure to provide alternative water sources. These efforts aim to reduce long-term health risks associated with chemical exposure in private wells.
The takeaway
Public pressure from state leaders remains a primary driver for military transparency and environmental accountability. Residents near military installations should continue to monitor local water quality reports for updates on site remediation progress.
Further reading
For more information on military environmental policies, see the Military section.
Live Poll
Is the federal government moving fast enough to clean up hazardous toxic chemical sites?










