Jury Selection Began in Baltimore Road Rage Trial
The trial of Buddy Rositzky, 25, follows an alleged road rage shooting incident in Baltimore.
Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Violence

Jury selection commenced in Baltimore City Circuit Court for the attempted murder trial of 25-year-old Buddy Rositzky. The defendant faces charges stemming from an alleged road rage incident involving a 33-year-old female driver.
Why it matters
The case examines a violent confrontation that escalated to gunfire on city streets. It remains to be determined how the court will interpret the conflicting accounts of the exchange of fire between the defendant and the victim.
Jury selection for the attempted murder trial began September 21, 2026, at the Baltimore City Circuit Court. The trial is scheduled for a duration of 3 days.
The players
Buddy Rositzky
He is a 25-year-old defendant currently standing trial for attempted murder.
Videtta Brown
She is the judge presiding over the trial at the Baltimore City Circuit Court.
Baltimore City Police
The local agency responsible for investigating the incident and apprehending the suspect in a rear alley.
The details
Buddy Rositzky is accused of firing a gun at a 33-year-old driver while riding an electric moped, an incident that resulted in the victim crashing her vehicle in the 300 block of South Poppleton Street. Prosecutors contend the clash was a road rage retaliation, while evidence includes audio recordings of moped engines and gunfire.
Timeline
Jury selection for the trial began on September 21, 2026.
The trial is expected to officially start on September 22, 2026.
Legal Context
This case follows a pattern of prosecutions for violent crime within the Baltimore City Circuit Court system. The trial reflects how local courts handle aggressive road rage incidents that result in the deployment of firearms by multiple parties.
The case highlights concerns regarding safety and violent interactions during traffic incidents in Baltimore. Residents should remain aware of ongoing security concerns in high-traffic corridors following this incident.
The takeaway
This case underscores the severe legal repercussions stemming from road rage incidents involving firearms. It serves as a reminder of the hazards associated with aggressive driving and the escalation of conflict on public roadways.
Further reading
For more on criminal proceedings in the area, visit the Violence section.










