New Bedford Consultant Granted Retirement Service Credits
The Division of Administrative Law Appeals ruled a city consultant was an employee, allowing for the purchase of service credits.
Updated on Oct. 15, 2026 in Human Resources

Live Poll
Should government consultants who perform full-time employee duties receive the same retirement benefits as permanent staff?
The Division of Administrative Law Appeals determined that a consultant for the City of New Bedford was an employee rather than an independent contractor. Consequently, the New Bedford Retirement Board must allow the individual to purchase service credits for 19 months of work.
Why it matters
The ruling settles a dispute over whether the individual was entitled to municipal pension benefits based on their tenure. It clarifies that the nature of supervision and use of city resources can define a worker as an employee regardless of their title.
The ruling spanned 16 pages and establishes that the individual is eligible to claim 19 months of service time.
The players
New Bedford Retirement Board
This is the municipal entity responsible for managing pension benefits and retirement service credit eligibility for city staff.
Division of Administrative Law Appeals
This state agency acts as an impartial forum to resolve disputes between public employees and government retirement boards.
The details
The petitioner performed duties at City Hall, including auditing tasks and Chief Financial Officer responsibilities, while under the supervision of the mayor and the city's finance chief. Because the individual used city-provided office equipment and communication tools, the magistrate found they were functioning as a city employee.
Timeline
The petitioner served as a city consultant from 2021 to 2023.
The New Bedford Retirement Board declined the purchase of service request on May 23, 2025.
An administrative magistrate issued the final ruling on the appeal on October 2, 2026.
Market Landscape
This decision mirrors broader trends in public sector human resources where the classification of temporary staff is under increased scrutiny. It highlights how the integration of consultants into daily municipal operations can trigger obligations under Massachusetts public employee retirement law.
Local taxpayers and city staff may observe changes in how the city classifies contractual work to avoid future pension liabilities. This ruling establishes that personnel performing core city functions may hold rights to benefits previously only accessible to permanent employees.
The takeaway
This case serves as a reminder that the actual working relationship between a contractor and a public entity often carries more weight than formal job titles. Documentation of daily supervision and the use of government assets are key factors in determining employee status.
Further reading
Learn more about local employment practices and policies on the New Bedford Human Resources page.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Live Poll
Should government consultants who perform full-time employee duties receive the same retirement benefits as permanent staff?










