Insurer Filed Lawsuit Over Starlight Studios Theft Claims
Great American Risk Solutions seeks to deny coverage for damages to a New Orleans film studio.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Property Crime
Live Poll
Do you generally trust that insurance companies will cover claims as promised in their policies?
Great American Risk Solutions filed a complaint in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to contest insurance claims from Starlight Studios. The insurer argues the policyholder failed to maintain necessary security measures and left the Old Gentilly Road property vacant for too long.
Why it matters
This dispute highlights the complex conditions often tied to commercial insurance policies, specifically regarding vacancy and alarm system requirements. The outcome will determine if the studio can recover repair costs after multiple burglary incidents.
The insurer filed the complaint in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on October 1, 2026. The action seeks a judicial declaration to deny coverage based on alleged policy violations involving property vacancy and missing alarm systems.
The players
Great American Risk Solutions
This insurance company is the plaintiff in the legal action seeking to deny coverage for the reported losses at the soundstage complex.
Starlight Studios
The policyholder is the owner of the New Orleans studio complex that submitted burglary claims for property damage.
The details
Great American Risk Solutions alleges that thieves cut power and fiber-optic lines to bypass security cameras, subsequently stripping electrical components and HVAC units. The insurer asserts the property on Old Gentilly Road was vacant for more than 60 consecutive days and lacked an active burglar alarm during the 2026 theft incidents.
Timeline
2021: Hurricane Ida caused initial damage at the studio property.
February 2025: The last tenant vacated the soundstage complex.
January 31-February 2, 2026: The first theft incident occurred.
February 3-9, 2026: The second theft incident occurred.
October 1, 2026: Great American Risk Solutions filed the lawsuit.
Legal Context
This case follows the standard pattern of insurers citing long-term property vacancy to trigger exclusion clauses and deny coverage. The dispute centers on the application of the vacancy exclusion clause in commercial insurance contracts, reflecting a common point of contention in commercial property litigation.
Residents and local business owners in the area should note the importance of maintaining active security and alarm systems on vacant properties to ensure insurance coverage remains valid. The lawsuit underscores the potential for property owners to lose financial protection if maintenance and security requirements are not strictly documented and followed.
The takeaway
Commercial property owners should conduct thorough reviews of their insurance policies to ensure compliance with vacancy clauses and security maintenance requirements. Failing to meet these conditions during periods of inactivity can lead to severe coverage denials during legal or insurance disputes.
Further reading
For more information on legal actions involving property, visit Property Crime.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Insurance Business.
Live Poll
Do you generally trust that insurance companies will cover claims as promised in their policies?
