Most Valuable Promotions Challenges Schofield-Bahdi Result
The promoter claims that officiating errors cost Lucas Bahdi a victory in his title bout against Floyd Schofield.
Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Boxing
Live Poll
Should official boxing match results be subject to overturning based on post-fight officiating reviews?
Most Valuable Promotions has filed a formal challenge with the WBA following the unanimous decision loss by Lucas Bahdi to Floyd Schofield. The promoter asserts that missed knockdown calls during the fight directly influenced the final result.
Why it matters
The dispute centers on allegations that proper officiating of three specific rounds would have shifted the outcome in favor of Bahdi. Most Valuable Promotions argues that accurate scoring would have resulted in a majority decision victory for its fighter.
The judges scored the bout 115-111, 116-110, and 119-108 in favor of Schofield. Most Valuable Promotions claims that correctly counting the missed knockdowns in the third, sixth, and ninth rounds would have secured a win for Bahdi.
The players
Most Valuable Promotions
This is a combat sports promotional company that manages high-profile fighters and organizes major boxing events.
Floyd Schofield
He is a professional boxer who competed for the WBA lightweight title in Chicago.
Lucas Bahdi
He is a professional boxer who challenged for the WBA lightweight title.
The details
Most Valuable Promotions conducted a video review of the fight to pinpoint alleged errors made by the referee. The promoter maintains that failing to rule on tangles as knockdowns fundamentally altered the competitive balance of the 12-round contest.
Timeline
October 10, 2026: Floyd Schofield defeated Lucas Bahdi in Chicago.
October 19, 2026: Most Valuable Promotions issued a formal statement challenging the result.
Season Trajectory
This dispute follows a pattern set by past high-profile judging controversies in boxing where promoters challenge the finality of official scorecards. It forces a review of officiating standards that could impact the WBA lightweight division standings.
The WBA must now determine whether to review the tape and potentially alter the official records for the lightweight title bout. Fans of the sport are waiting to see if this challenge triggers a broader audit of refereeing and judging protocols in upcoming matches.
The takeaway
This contest serves as a reminder of the significant influence officiating has on the professional boxing landscape and its standings. Readers should note that while fighters often rely on judges, these formal challenges remain a rare mechanism for recourse after a loss.
Further reading
For more information on the current landscape of professional fighting, visit our Boxing section.
Live Poll
Should official boxing match results be subject to overturning based on post-fight officiating reviews?
