Illinois Voters to Consider Anti-BDS Law Referendum
Voters in several Illinois townships will weigh in on the state law restricting business boycotts of Israel on November 3.
Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Unions

Live Poll
Should state pension funds be used to penalize companies based on their political boycotts?
Residents of Champaign and Cunningham townships are set to vote on a non-binding referendum regarding the state law that penalizes businesses for boycotting Israel. Six other Illinois townships will also include similar questions on their ballots during the November 3 election.
Why it matters
The referendum serves as a test of public sentiment on legislation that proponents argue restricts First Amendment rights, while opponents maintain it is a necessary protection against the normalization of violence. Lawmakers are expected to look at the results as an indicator of constituent support for or opposition to existing policy.
The Illinois anti-BDS law has been in effect for 11 years, and the Illinois Investment Policy Board currently maintains a restricted list of 27 companies, including Adidas and Air Canada.
The players
Carol Ammons
She is a member of the Illinois House of Representatives who sponsored legislative attempts to modify the state anti-BDS law.
Illinois Investment Policy Board
This state entity is responsible for managing the list of companies prohibited from receiving pension fund investments due to business ties with specific nations.
The details
The referendum asks voters if Illinois should repeal amendments to the Illinois Pension Code that currently prohibit investments in companies that boycott Israel. While State Representative Carol Ammons previously introduced legislation to remove these companies from the restricted list, those bills have not advanced in the state legislature.
Timeline
The state passed its original anti-BDS law in 2015.
The Illinois Investment Policy Board added Unilever to the restricted list in 2021.
Election Day voting is scheduled for November 3, 2026.
Political Context
The push to repeal these provisions faces resistance from those who argue the law protects against the ostracization of Israel. This debate centers on whether the state pension system should be used as a tool for geopolitical signaling or managed strictly for financial returns.
While the vote is non-binding, it directly affects the political pressure placed on local representatives regarding the state's investment priorities. Residents can express their stance on how the Illinois Pension Code handles boycotts through the ballot on Election Day.
The takeaway
Voters have a chance to make their voices heard on a law that has long been a flashpoint for state financial policy. This non-binding vote will likely play a major role in shaping future legislative conversations regarding the state pension board's restricted list.
Further reading
Find more coverage on state labor and policy issues in the Illinois Unions section.
Live Poll
Should state pension funds be used to penalize companies based on their political boycotts?










