Idaho Supreme Court Remands Workers Compensation Case

The high court rules a lower court must apply the right-to-control test in a contractor injury lawsuit.

Updated on Oct. 24, 2026 in Human Resources

Isometric editorial illustration of industrial construction tools and metal railing components, conveying a procedural legal review in Idaho. — The Idaho Supreme Court remanded a worker's compensation lawsuit, ordering a lower court to apply the right-to-control test to determine employer liability. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should injured workers be allowed to sue onsite contractors for negligence beyond collecting workers' compensation?

The Idaho Supreme Court has reversed a lower court decision in a workers' compensation lawsuit involving a worker injured after falling from a balcony. Justices ordered the trial court to re-examine the case using the right-to-control test to determine if the exclusive-remedy doctrine applies.

Why it matters

The ruling clarifies that trial courts cannot automatically grant summary judgment based on shared contracting work without first evaluating the actual level of control an employer exerts over the worker. This decision ensures that employee and statutory-employer status are properly distinguished under Idaho law.

The Idaho Supreme Court issued its ruling under Case No. 52706-2025. The decision mandates a new analysis of the relationship between the worker and the contractor.

The players

Idaho Supreme Court

This is the highest judicial body in the state of Idaho and is responsible for interpreting state laws and reviewing lower court decisions.

The details

The worker sued a contractor, alleging the firm removed and improperly reinstalled a railing that broke, leading to a fall from a second-story balcony. The lower court initially dismissed the case, but the Supreme Court found this was premature without the right-to-control test.

The Idaho Supreme Court issued its ruling on October 22, 2026.

Market Landscape

The ruling impacts how contracting firms manage liability and subcontractor oversight across the state. It highlights a shift toward rigorous judicial scrutiny of the Idaho workers' compensation exclusive-remedy doctrine in construction litigation.

Contractors and workers in Idaho should note that employment status is not automatically assumed based on shared project sites. This clarification may lead to more nuanced legal challenges for workers seeking damages from third-party contractors.

The takeaway

This decision reinforces the importance of the right-to-control test in determining workplace legal liability. Businesses should ensure their contractual relationships are clearly defined to avoid disputes regarding the exclusive-remedy doctrine.