Hawaii Voters to Decide on Tax Bond Amendment
Residents will vote Tuesday on a constitutional amendment to fund affordable housing infrastructure.
Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Elections

Live Poll
Should your local government use future property tax revenue to fund new housing infrastructure projects?
Hawaii voters will decide on a constitutional amendment this Tuesday regarding the issuance of tax increment bonds. The measure seeks to enable infrastructure funding for affordable housing beyond current county debt limits.
Why it matters
The proposal aims to address the ongoing housing crisis and improve community resilience against severe weather. By utilizing future property tax revenues, the state intends to fund critical systems like roads, water, and sewer lines.
This ballot measure authorizes resilient infrastructure for shelter and equity bonds following the passage of Senate Bill 3218. Tax increment financing laws have been utilized in Hawaii since 1985.
The players
Josh Green
He is the Governor of Hawaii who signed Senate Bill 3218 into law in May 2026.
Tax Foundation of Hawaii
This organization formally opposed the legislation regarding the constitutional amendment.
RISE Together Hawaii PAC
This political action committee managed a media campaign to support the ballot measure.
Pacific Resource Partnership
This entity collaborated on a media campaign to encourage voter support for the infrastructure proposal.
The details
The amendment permits the state to use future property tax revenues to pay off infrastructure bond debt. Governor Josh Green signed the enabling legislation on May 22, 2026, following a unanimous vote in both the state House and Senate.
Timeline
1985: Hawaii established initial tax-increment financing laws.
May 22, 2026: Governor Josh Green signed Senate Bill 3218.
Mid-October 2026: Supporters campaigned for the ballot measure.
October 27, 2026: Hawaii voters will decide on the constitutional amendment.
Political Context
Opposition to the amendment has been led by the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, which raised concerns regarding the financial framework of the proposal. Conversely, supporters argue the measure is a necessary evolution of state infrastructure policy established in 1985.
If passed, the amendment could fundamentally change how infrastructure for affordable housing is financed in the state. Voters should consider how the redirection of future property tax revenue may affect county budgets and local services in their area.
The takeaway
Voters are evaluating whether the potential for increased housing infrastructure justifies moving beyond established county debt limits. Implementation of this financing model could provide significant long-term funding for essential community services.
Further reading
For more on upcoming races and measures, visit Hawaii Elections.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Bond Buyer.
Live Poll
Should your local government use future property tax revenue to fund new housing infrastructure projects?










