Florida Supreme Court Suspends Attorney Chuck Farah

Farah, a Jacksonville lawyer, is suspended for 90 days over mishandling a large volume of 2008 tobacco lawsuits.

Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Financial Crime

Florida Supreme Court Suspends Attorney Chuck Farah

Live Poll

Do you trust local lawyers to be held accountable when they mishandle cases?

The Florida Supreme Court ordered a 90-day suspension of Chuck Farah from practicing law on October 1, with the suspension delayed 30 days to allow management of existing cases. The ruling follows a referee's recommendation and concerns tobacco lawsuits filed in 2008.

Why it matters

Federal judges concluded at least 1,250 of the 2008-vintage tobacco cases were frivolous, and some involved people who never smoked or did not authorize representation. The discipline underscores accountability for mass-filed litigation handled by Florida attorneys.

The Florida Supreme Court ordered a 90-day suspension of Farah, with the effective date delayed 30 days, after a referee recommended a 30-day suspension. Co-counsel Norwood Wilner was previously suspended for 91 days, and the extraction does not indicate any pending appeal.

The players

Chuck Farah

A Jacksonville attorney and partner at Farah & Farah, practicing since 1990 with no prior disciplinary record.

Norwood Wilner

A co-counsel on the tobacco lawsuits who was previously suspended from practicing law for 91 days.

Christopher Kelly

A Volusia County circuit judge who served as the referee in the disciplinary proceedings against Farah.

The details

Farah and Wilner were co-counsels on tobacco lawsuits filed in 2008, and Farah acknowledged problems communicating adequately with clients, providing diligent representation, and obtaining written contingency agreements. A circuit judge found no dishonest or selfish motive, and no client filed a complaint or alleged misappropriation of funds.

Timeline

  1. 2008: Tobacco lawsuits filed that were later deemed frivolous.

  2. 2017: The Times-Union reported federal judges' findings on the cases.

  3. 2025: A referee report recommended a 30-day suspension.

  4. October 1, 2026: The Florida Supreme Court ordered the 90-day suspension.

Legal Context

The suspensions of Farah and Wilner follow federal judges' conclusion that at least 1,250 of the 2008 tobacco cases were frivolous, a finding that has driven scrutiny of mass-filed litigation in Florida courts. The discipline shows state bar enforcement reaching attorneys whose practices produced those filings.

Clients of Farah & Farah and others with cases tied to the 2008 tobacco filings may see changes in representation as the firm transitions cases during the 30-day wind-down period. Florida residents who previously hired these attorneys should review their case status with the firm or the court.

The takeaway

Attorneys handling mass-filed litigation remain accountable for client communication, written contingency agreements, and ensuring every filing has an authorized client. Clients should confirm their representation and case status directly with their attorney.

Further reading

For more on related legal and financial misconduct, see Financial Crime coverage across Florida.

Live Poll

Do you trust local lawyers to be held accountable when they mishandle cases?