Judge Narrows Wrongful Death Suit Against Stew Leonard's
The court dismissed individual liability claims while allowing the case against the retailer and supplier to proceed.
Updated on Oct. 22, 2026 in Allergies

A Connecticut judge dismissed personal liability claims against individual employees and the namesake of Stew Leonard's in a wrongful death lawsuit. The case continues against the retail franchise and its wholesaler, Cookies United, following the death of a dancer from anaphylactic shock.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the exclusivity of the Connecticut Product Liability Act in cases involving defective products. By focusing the legal action on corporate entities rather than individuals, the court is addressing the chain of accountability for food labeling negligence.
Stew Leonard's paid $50,000 to the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection and donated $200,000 to a food allergy research nonprofit. The case involves a dancer who died at age 25 after eating a mislabeled cookie.
The players
Kimberly Massicotte
She is a judge at the Waterbury Superior Court who presided over the wrongful death litigation.
Stew Leonard's
This is a regional grocery store chain headquartered in Connecticut that is currently facing a wrongful death lawsuit.
Cookies United
This is an Islip-based wholesaler that manufactured the cookie involved in the fatal incident.
The details
The lawsuit alleges that the failure to list peanuts as an ingredient on a vanilla Florentine cookie package was a negligent act leading to the fatal allergic reaction in January 2024. The court determined that under the Connecticut Product Liability Act, the corporate entities are the proper targets for litigation rather than individual staff members.
Timeline
January 11, 2024: The dancer consumed the cookie and suffered anaphylactic shock.
May 2024: The estate filed the original wrongful death lawsuit.
September 16, 2025: Judge Massicotte dismissed claims against individual executives and employees.
October 15, 2026: Judge Massicotte ruled on the amended lawsuit.
Health Landscape
The ruling adheres to the standards set by the Connecticut Product Liability Act to determine liability in cases involving defective food labeling. This decision clarifies that corporate accountability takes precedence over individual staff liability in product safety disputes.
Consumers should remain vigilant about reading ingredient labels on all packaged foods regardless of the brand's reputation for safety. This legal case highlights the vital importance of accurate labeling for individuals managing severe food allergies.
The takeaway
This case illustrates the legal complexities surrounding liability in food-related fatalities and the importance of strict regulatory compliance. Readers should always double-check ingredient lists for allergens to ensure personal safety when purchasing prepared goods.
Further reading
For more information on food safety and allergen risks, visit the Connecticut Allergies section.










