Prosecutors Decline Charges in Tenderloin Pedestrian Death
The San Francisco District Attorney cited insufficient evidence after a driver fatally struck a Glide safety monitor.
Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Accidents
Justin Randle, a 25-year-old safety monitor at Glide, died after being struck by a vehicle in the Tenderloin neighborhood. The San Francisco District Attorney has declined to file criminal charges against the driver.
Why it matters
The decision not to prosecute follows a review by the District Attorney, who determined there was insufficient evidence to prove a criminal case beyond a reasonable doubt. The case has sparked significant local concern regarding safety in the area.
The San Francisco District Attorney declined to file charges following the initial murder booking by police. Officials stated they could not meet the burden of proof required for a criminal case.
The players
Justin Randle
He was a 25-year-old safety monitor at Glide who is survived by three children.
San Francisco District Attorney
The local elected official responsible for evaluating evidence and pursuing criminal charges in city cases.
Glide
A community organization based in the Tenderloin known for its outreach and social services.
California Highway Patrol
The state law enforcement agency that located the vehicle involved in the collision on Treasure Island.
The details
The incident occurred when a vehicle struck Randle at 1:06 a.m. in the Tenderloin district, after which the driver fled the scene. California Highway Patrol officers later located the vehicle on Treasure Island during an unrelated traffic stop.
Timeline
The collision occurred at 1:06 a.m. on October 25, 2026.
Legal Context
This case highlights the challenges of proving criminal liability under the California Penal Code's burden of proof standards. The decision to release the driver contrasts with the heightened scrutiny surrounding hit-and-run fatalities in major urban centers.
Residents in the Tenderloin may see continued calls for increased pedestrian safety and security measures in the area. The outcome of this case serves as a point of interest for those tracking local law enforcement responses to fatal collisions.
The takeaway
This case serves as a reminder of the complex evidentiary requirements needed to sustain felony charges in fatal vehicular incidents. Family members and local activists continue to advocate for transparency following the loss of a prominent community safety advocate.
Further reading
For more information on local traffic and transit incidents, visit San Francisco Accidents.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Mission Local.
