Candidate Pleads Not Guilty to Election Fraud
Randolph Oscar Madrid faces multiple felony counts over allegations he does not reside in the district.
Updated on Oct. 24, 2026 in Elections

Live Poll
Should local candidates face stricter verification processes to prove they live in the district they represent?
Randolph Oscar Madrid, 73, pleaded not guilty to election fraud charges during an arraignment held on October 23, 2026. Investigators allege that Madrid, who is running for a Menifee city council seat, actually resides in Lake Elsinore.
Why it matters
The case raises questions regarding the integrity of local candidacy filings and residency requirements. Despite the felony charges, Madrid remains on the ballot for the upcoming election.
Madrid faces two counts of perjury, one count of filing a false candidacy declaration, and one count of false voter registration. He is currently free on a $30,000 bond.
The players
Randolph Oscar Madrid
He is a 73-year-old candidate for the Menifee city council currently facing felony election fraud charges.
Jay Kiel
He is a Superior Court Judge who presided over the arraignment of the defendant.
The details
Superior Court Judge Jay Kiel presided over the session as the defendant appeared to answer for claims that he misrepresented his home address. The investigation began after authorities received an official complaint regarding residency, revealing Madrid resided in Lake Elsinore rather than the district he sought to represent.
Timeline
Madrid was arrested in September 2026.
The arraignment occurred on October 23, 2026.
The Menifee city council election is set for November 3, 2026.
A felony settlement conference is scheduled for February 3, 2027.
Political Context
This legal challenge highlights the growing scrutiny on residency standards mandated by the California Elections Code. Critics and local advocacy groups often push for stricter verification processes to ensure candidates have authentic ties to their represented districts.
Voters in the district now face uncertainty regarding a candidate who remains on the ballot despite pending felony charges. This situation complicates the decision for those heading to the polls on November 3.
The takeaway
The case serves as a reminder for voters to verify the residency and background of candidates before casting their ballots. Local residents are encouraged to stay informed on official election board updates as the investigation continues.
Further reading
Follow ongoing updates regarding local governance and candidate qualifications on our Elections page.
Source note: This article includes information reported by My News LA.
Live Poll
Should local candidates face stricter verification processes to prove they live in the district they represent?










