Jack Doherty Attorneys File Motion to Withdraw
Counsel for the 23-year-old creator filed a request to end representation at the Van Nuys Superior Court.
Updated on Oct. 15, 2026 in Mixed Martial Arts
Live Poll
Should attorneys be permitted to withdraw from representing clients during active litigation proceedings?
Attorneys Courtney M. Serrato and Olivia Zorayan filed a request to withdraw as counsel for Jack Doherty. The filing follows a lawsuit by Chase Cameron Gardella, who alleges he was assaulted by Doherty’s bodyguard.
Why it matters
The withdrawal request complicates the ongoing litigation regarding serious allegations of assault, battery, and negligence. These legal proceedings stem from a civil lawsuit involving Doherty and his associate Justin Goslee.
Attorneys filed a formal motion to withdraw in Van Nuys Superior Court citing professional considerations. A court hearing regarding the request is scheduled for November 23, 2026.
The players
Jack Doherty
He is a content creator who is the defendant in a civil lawsuit involving allegations of assault and negligence.
Chase Cameron Gardella
He is the plaintiff who filed a lawsuit alleging he was beaten by a bodyguard at a Halloween party.
Justin Goslee
He is an associate of Doherty who was reportedly hired for security and content production.
Courtney M. Serrato
She is an attorney who filed a motion to withdraw from representing Jack Doherty.
Olivia Zorayan
She is an attorney who filed a motion to withdraw from representing Jack Doherty.
The details
Plaintiff Chase Cameron Gardella sued Jack Doherty, Jack Doherty LLC, Banger Official LLC, and Justin Goslee over claims involving a Halloween party incident. The suit alleges Doherty instructed his security to commit violence and cites a 2023 video where Goslee knocked a woman unconscious.
Timeline
Doherty hired Goslee as security and content participant in 2023.
Doherty and Goslee reportedly viewed a violent security video in October 2023.
Attorneys filed court papers seeking to end representation on October 13, 2026.
A court hearing on the request to end representation is set for November 23, 2026.
The trial for the lawsuit is scheduled to begin on March 29, 2027.
Legal Context
This case follows a pattern set by the ongoing civil litigation trends involving influencer liability by testing the legal culpability of creators for the actions of their staff. Such suits are increasingly common as courts evaluate the boundary between content creation and professional liability.
The legal developments at the Van Nuys Superior Court highlight the formal process of holding content creators accountable for alleged violent behavior. Residents and observers should note that these proceedings are set to continue through 2027.
The takeaway
Legal disputes involving high-profile creators can lead to significant shifts in counsel as cases progress toward trial. Parties involved in similar civil lawsuits are often required to navigate complex procedural deadlines established by the court.
What happens next
The court will hold a hearing on the motion to withdraw on November 23, 2026, followed by the start of the civil trial on March 29, 2027.
Further reading
For more on legal issues in the industry, visit Los Angeles Mixed Martial Arts.
Source note: This article includes information reported by My News LA.
Live Poll
Should attorneys be permitted to withdraw from representing clients during active litigation proceedings?
