Carson Council Aide Settled Wrongful Termination Lawsuit
A former council aide and the city of Carson reached a conditional agreement in a legal dispute over job termination.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Human Resources

Live Poll
Do you trust local government officials in your area to use staff for public duties only?
Justin Battle, a former Carson council aide, has reached a conditional settlement in his wrongful termination lawsuit against the city. Battle previously alleged that he was fired for refusing to perform personal errands and surveillance activities for Councilwoman Arleen Bocatija Rojas.
Why it matters
The settlement resolves claims that Battle was terminated for reporting illegal conduct and refusing to participate in unethical tasks. The city had previously maintained that his firing was due to performance issues and schedule conflicts.
Battle alleged his duties included performing personal tasks for Councilwoman Arleen Bocatija Rojas while maintaining a 30-hour weekly schedule at Stephen M. White Middle School. The city attributed his November 2023 termination to performance issues identified during his probationary period.
The players
Justin Battle
He is a former municipal employee who served as a recreation assistant, administrative intern, and council aide for the city of Carson.
Arleen Bocatija Rojas
She is a member of the Carson City Council who was accused by a former aide of requesting personal favors and surveillance of colleagues.
Jim Dear
He is a Carson City Councilman who was allegedly the target of requested surveillance by a fellow council member.
Robert Lennox
He serves as an assistant city manager in Carson and received reports regarding alleged misconduct from a council aide.
The details
Battle, who served in various municipal roles in Carson from 2019 to 2023, claimed that he was fired after complaining to Assistant City Manager Robert Lennox. The case involves allegations that the city violated the state Labor Code during the employment of the council aide.
Timeline
Battle was hired as a recreation assistant in 2019.
He served as an administrative intern starting in June 2022.
He held the position of council aide beginning in March 2023.
The city terminated his employment in November 2023.
A request for case dismissal is expected by February 1, 2027.
Market Landscape
This settlement reflects broader municipal governance trends where employment disputes frequently rely on the California Labor Code to resolve conflicts between staff and elected officials. Such cases often highlight the challenges of administrative oversight and the internal power dynamics within city council offices.
Residents may see administrative changes following this settlement as the city reconciles its internal personnel policies with labor law requirements. This resolution marks a conclusion to the ongoing legal costs associated with the wrongful termination lawsuit.
The takeaway
This case underscores the importance of clear communication and ethical boundaries between elected officials and their staff members. Employees who believe they are being asked to perform non-work-related or illegal tasks should document those requests to protect their legal standing.
Further reading
Find more information on local labor disputes and municipal employment policies in the Human Resources section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by My News LA.
Live Poll
Do you trust local government officials in your area to use staff for public duties only?









