Competency Trial to Decide Anabell Correa Case
A Bakersfield judge scheduled a competency hearing for November 2 following a defense request.
Updated on Sept. 29, 2026 in Crime — General

Judge Andrew Kendall will hold a competency trial on November 2 to determine if Anabell Correa is fit to stand trial for murder. The proceedings were delayed after the defense challenged a forensic psychologist's assessment of Correa's mental fitness.
Why it matters
The competency trial serves as a necessary legal gatekeeper to determine if the defendant can understand the proceedings and participate in her own defense. The criminal trial for the two murder counts cannot move forward until this mental fitness question is resolved.
Anabell Correa is currently charged with two counts of murder. The competency trial is scheduled for November 2 to address defense challenges to a previous forensic evaluation.
The players
Andrew Kendall
He is the judge overseeing the criminal proceedings and the competency trial in Bakersfield.
Anabell Correa
She is the defendant facing two counts of murder related to a March 2025 vehicle collision.
Paul Brar
He is the defense attorney who requested the trial to challenge the competency opinion.
Max Austin Mooney
He is one of the victims who died following the collision at Coffee Road and Stockdale Highway.
Desiree Paula Noelle Mooney
She is one of the victims who died following the collision at Coffee Road and Stockdale Highway.
The details
Correa is accused of causing a fatal collision on March 16, 2025, at the intersection of Coffee Road and Stockdale Highway. Forensic reports cited in the case indicate her blood-alcohol level was 0.088% at the time of the incident, which resulted in the deaths of Max Austin Mooney and Desiree Paula Noelle Mooney.
Timeline
March 16, 2025: Correa allegedly caused the fatal collision.
September 2026: A forensic psychologist performed a competency examination.
November 2, 2026: The competency trial is scheduled to occur.
Legal Context
This competency hearing follows the precedent set by the Dusky v. United States standard for determining whether a defendant is mentally fit to proceed with a criminal trial. Such hearings ensure that the justice system maintains procedural fairness when a defendant's mental state is in question.
The upcoming trial and subsequent legal proceedings may cause temporary traffic considerations near the courthouse in Bakersfield. The case has raised community awareness regarding the legal consequences of driving with a blood-alcohol level above the 0.080% threshold.
The takeaway
A competency trial is a critical step in the judicial process to protect a defendant's right to a fair trial. The outcome of the November 2 hearing will determine whether the criminal murder case proceeds as scheduled or remains on hold.
Further reading
Learn more about local proceedings in the Crime — General section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by KGET 17.










