Andy Biggs Opposed 2005 Arizona Sex Trafficking Bill

The former legislator cast one of four dissenting votes against a bill increasing penalties for trafficking minors.

Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Sex Crimes

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a stylized capitol building facade, rendered in navy, cream, and red to evoke institutional policy. — Congressman Andy Biggs drew scrutiny for his 2005 vote against Arizona Senate Bill 1338, which sought to increase penalties for trafficking minors. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Does a candidate's past voting record on crime influence your trust in their current platform?

In 2005, Andy Biggs cast one of four opposing votes against Arizona Senate Bill 1338. The legislation reclassified the trafficking of victims under the age of 15 as a dangerous crime against children.

Why it matters

The vote highlights the legislative record of the congressman regarding criminal justice reform. SB 1338 established a 20-year presumptive sentence for first-time offenders and a 30-year term for repeat traffickers.

SB 1338 created a 20-year presumptive sentence for first-time trafficking offenders and a 30-year sentence for subsequent offenses. Governor Janet Napolitano signed the bill into law following its passage.

The players

Andy Biggs

He is a U.S. Congressman who previously served in the Arizona House of Representatives.

Janet Napolitano

She served as the Governor of Arizona who signed SB 1338 into law.

The details

During his tenure in the Arizona House, Biggs also voted against a 2005 bill regarding sex offender registration. In 2007, he served as the lone committee vote against legislation toughening penalties for child prostitution, and he later opposed a 2018 bill targeting online sex trafficking.

2005: Andy Biggs voted against SB 1338 and a sex offender registration bill.
2007: Biggs voted against a law increasing penalties for child prostitution.
2013: Biggs blocked a push to investigate a specific police force.
2018: Biggs opposed a bill aimed at cracking down on online sex trafficking.
July 2026: Polling indicated Hobbs held a 4% lead over Biggs.

Legal Context

The vote on SB 1338 represents a departure from the broader legislative consensus that established harsh penalties for crimes against children in Arizona. Such votes are frequently examined to contrast individual records against the state's historical efforts to strengthen criminal codes.

The voting record of elected officials serves as a primary metric for voters evaluating candidates on public safety issues. Residents may use these historical records to understand how their representatives have shaped state laws governing the protection of minors.

The takeaway

Legislative records provide a transparent window into how representatives have prioritized criminal justice issues throughout their careers. Voters often evaluate these past positions to determine how current candidates may approach future policy changes regarding public safety.