Rigsby Critiques Montgomery Testimony Over Restroom Bill
The House District 25 representative recently discussed his opponent's past legislative testimony on the campaign trail.
Updated on Oct. 30, 2026 in Legislative Policy
Live Poll
Should a candidate's past testimony on controversial bills influence how you vote in local elections?
Incumbent Representative Phillip Rigsby criticized Alabama House District 25 challenger Allison Montgomery for her February 2024 testimony against a restroom access bill. The discussion occurred during a recent radio appearance ahead of the November 3 election.
Why it matters
The exchange highlights contrasting political priorities in the state as candidates frame their past legislative records for voters. Montgomery, a transgender candidate, previously opposed the bill on the basis that it was a risky piece of legislation.
Allison Montgomery testified against a bill protecting girls' restrooms before a Senate committee in February 2024. This action is now a focal point in the race for Alabama House District 25.
The players
Phillip Rigsby
He is the incumbent representative serving Alabama House District 25 in the state legislature.
Allison Montgomery
She is a transgender political candidate campaigning for a seat in the Alabama House of Representatives.
The details
Phillip Rigsby, the incumbent representative for Alabama House District 25, used a radio show appearance to challenge Montgomery's legislative history. Montgomery is running on a platform that includes the expansion of Medicaid and the repeal of the CHOOSE Act.
Timeline
Allison Montgomery testified against the restroom access bill in February 2024.
Phillip Rigsby appeared on The Yaffee Show on October 29, 2026.
Rigsby commented on the legislative record on October 30, 2026.
The election for House District 25 is scheduled for November 3, 2026.
Political Context
Opponents of the candidate's legislative record often point to her active opposition against the CHOOSE Act to define her policy stances. This criticism is countered by supporters who argue her positions on Medicaid expansion and administrative reform prioritize broader constituent needs.
The legislative record of candidates can signal how they might vote on future regulations regarding public facilities and state-funded programs. Voters should evaluate these past stances to understand the potential impact on local policies and state-managed services.
The takeaway
Voters often use historical committee testimony to gauge how a candidate will approach sensitive social issues if elected to office. Examining the full context of a candidate's legislative record allows for a more informed decision at the ballot box.
What happens next
Voters in House District 25 will head to the polls on November 3, 2026, to decide between the candidates.
Further reading
For more background on state-level lawmaking, visit the Legislative Policy section.
Live Poll
Should a candidate's past testimony on controversial bills influence how you vote in local elections?
