DOJ Sues to Block Alaska Election Certification
Federal officials are challenging the presence of two candidates named Dan Sullivan on the state's upcoming ballot.
Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Elections

Live Poll
Should the federal government have the authority to block a state's election certification process?
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to prevent Alaska from certifying a win for Mary Peltola if a second Dan Sullivan remains on the ballot. This legal action comes as officials attempt to address voter confusion regarding the duplicate candidate names.
Why it matters
The lawsuit seeks to ensure electoral integrity by resolving the naming conflict before results are finalized. It represents a last-minute attempt to prevent potential challenges to the outcome of the U.S. Senate race.
The federal lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice targets the Alaska ballot featuring two candidates named Dan Sullivan. The legal challenge was initiated 11 days before the November 3 election.
The players
U.S. Department of Justice
This federal executive department is responsible for the enforcement of federal laws and the administration of justice.
Mary Peltola
She is a political candidate involved in the U.S. Senate race in Alaska.
Dan Sullivan
He is one of the candidates on the ballot whose shared name with another candidate has prompted a legal challenge.
Alaska Supreme Court
This is the highest judicial body in the state of Alaska that previously ruled on the ballot dispute.
The details
The Department of Justice demands that Alaska officials refrain from certifying a victory for Mary Peltola if the second candidate with the same name as Dan Sullivan is not removed. The Alaska Supreme Court had previously denied requests to strike one of the candidates named Dan Sullivan from the ballot.
Timeline
The Department of Justice filed the lawsuit on October 22, 2026.
The Alaska U.S. Senate election is scheduled for November 3, 2026.
Political Context
This lawsuit highlights the ongoing federal oversight required to ensure adherence to ballot standards established by the Help America Vote Act. Opponents of federal intervention argue that state judicial decisions, such as those made by the Alaska Supreme Court, should remain final.
This legal uncertainty may impact how Alaskans cast their ballots and the timeline for final race results. Residents should monitor official state guidance for any changes to voting procedures or certification schedules.
The takeaway
Voters should verify their candidate choices carefully when multiple individuals share the same name on the ballot. Following the outcome of this federal lawsuit will be essential for understanding the finality of the upcoming Senate race results.
Further reading
For more information on the voting process and ballot disputes, visit Alaska Elections.
Live Poll
Should the federal government have the authority to block a state's election certification process?









